Re: [PATCH] Document -fdump-tree-vect option

2017-10-13 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On 13/10/17 14:06 -0600, Sandra Loosemore wrote: On 10/13/2017 06:35 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: This adds an item to the list of options for the -fdump-tree option, because we show an example using 'vect' but don't document it. OK for trunk? No, I think this patch is addressing an imaginary

Re: [PATCH] Document -fdump-tree-vect option

2017-10-13 Thread Sandra Loosemore
On 10/13/2017 06:35 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: This adds an item to the list of options for the -fdump-tree option, because we show an example using 'vect' but don't document it. OK for trunk? No, I think this patch is addressing an imaginary bug. I see no "vect" option listed in the

[PATCH] Document -fdump-tree-vect option

2017-10-13 Thread Jonathan Wakely
This adds an item to the list of options for the -fdump-tree option, because we show an example using 'vect' but don't document it. OK for trunk? Is there any logic to the order of those options? Would it makes sense to order them alphabetically? diff --git a/gcc/ChangeLog b/gcc/ChangeLog