On 09/27/2016 03:05 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 2:57 PM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
>> On 09/27/16 08:46, Martin Liška wrote:
>>
Second version of the patch adds validation to gcov.exp, where $result is
scanned for "File ''".
Luckily current test-case hit that ver
On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 2:57 PM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
> On 09/27/16 08:46, Martin Liška wrote:
>
>>> Second version of the patch adds validation to gcov.exp, where $result is
>>> scanned for "File ''".
>>> Luckily current test-case hit that verification:
>>>
>>> FAIL: gcc.misc-tests/gcov-6.c gcov
On 09/27/16 08:46, Martin Liška wrote:
Second version of the patch adds validation to gcov.exp, where $result is scanned for
"File ''".
Luckily current test-case hit that verification:
FAIL: gcc.misc-tests/gcov-6.c gcov failed: .gcov should not be created
FAIL: gcc.misc-tests/gcov-7.c gcov fai
_reserved_location (gs))
>> to be more understandable (particularly as that matches the sense of
>> RESERVED_LOCATION_P.
>
> Agree with you, renamed to gimple_has_reserved_location.
> Ready with that change?
>
> Martin
>
>>
>> Richard?
>>
>
On 09/27/2016 01:32 PM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
> On 09/27/16 07:26, Martin Liška wrote:
>> Following patch prevents emission of gcno file (notes file) for statements
>> that do not point to original source file, like:
>>
>> $ echo "int main(){}" > x.c
>>
>> In this case the location points to a buil
On 09/27/16 07:26, Martin Liška wrote:
Following patch prevents emission of gcno file (notes file) for statements
that do not point to original source file, like:
$ echo "int main(){}" > x.c
In this case the location points to a builtin.
Patch can bootstrap on x86_64-linux-gnu and survives reg
be installed?
Martin
>From 0b33d288ecad252d00ef22fd72a1b1f12c0642ff Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: marxin
Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2016 17:38:07 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Fix PR gcov-profile/46266
gcc/ChangeLog:
2016-08-12 Martin Liska
PR gcov-profile/46266
* gimple.h (gimple_has_not_reserved_locatio
