On 28/09/19 23:12 +0200, François Dumont wrote:
Here is what I just commited.
I try to use the asm trick in the _GLIBCXX_DEBUG_VERIFY_COND_AT but
didn't notice any enhancement. So for now I kept my solution to just
have a non-constexpr call compiler error.
I fix my patch to use
On 30/09/19 22:21 +0200, François Dumont wrote:
On 9/30/19 11:03 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
These changes are fine but should have been a separate, unrelated
commit.
Ok, sorry, I consider that just a comment change was fine.
It's fine, but it is unrelated so should be a separate commit.
On 9/30/19 11:03 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 28/09/19 23:12 +0200, François Dumont wrote:
Here is what I just commited.
Thanks. In my branch I had a lot more _GLIBCXX20_CONSTEXPR additions
in the debug mode headers. Is it not needed on __check_singular,
__foreign_iterator etc. ?
Yes, I
On 28/09/19 23:12 +0200, François Dumont wrote:
Here is what I just commited.
Thanks. In my branch I had a lot more _GLIBCXX20_CONSTEXPR additions
in the debug mode headers. Is it not needed on __check_singular,
__foreign_iterator etc. ?
I try to use the asm trick in the
Here is what I just commited.
I try to use the asm trick in the _GLIBCXX_DEBUG_VERIFY_COND_AT but
didn't notice any enhancement. So for now I kept my solution to just
have a non-constexpr call compiler error.
I fix my patch to use __builtin_is_constant_evaluated rather than
