On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 09:51:05AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Feb 2024, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 09:35:43AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > I do wonder whether we can handle the missing LHS case generically
> > > in the direct optab expander for fns that
On Tue, 27 Feb 2024, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 09:35:43AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> > I do wonder whether we can handle the missing LHS case generically
> > in the direct optab expander for fns that are PURE or CONST?
>
> Maybe the 2 operand expand_internal_call could do
On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 09:35:43AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> I do wonder whether we can handle the missing LHS case generically
> in the direct optab expander for fns that are PURE or CONST?
Maybe the 2 operand expand_internal_call could do it before handing over
to individual expanders. Can
On Tue, 27 Feb 2024, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> While it seems a lot of places in various optimization passes fold
> bit query internal functions with INTEGER_CST arguments to INTEGER_CST
> when there is a lhs, when lhs is missing, all the removals of such dead
> stmts are guarded with -ftree
Hi!
While it seems a lot of places in various optimization passes fold
bit query internal functions with INTEGER_CST arguments to INTEGER_CST
when there is a lhs, when lhs is missing, all the removals of such dead
stmts are guarded with -ftree-dce, so with -fno-tree-dce those unfolded
ifn calls re
