Oh OK, thanks for the clarification.
Costas
On Wed, 7 Jun 2023 at 13:59, Jeff Law wrote:
>
>
> On 6/7/23 04:21, Costas Argyris via Gcc-patches wrote:
> > I saw this while working on something else:
> >
> > pex_unix_cleanup signature doesn't always match the
> > body of the function in terms of
On 6/7/23 04:21, Costas Argyris via Gcc-patches wrote:
I saw this while working on something else:
pex_unix_cleanup signature doesn't always match the
body of the function in terms of ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED.
If the conditional code in the body is compiled, then
ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED isn't correct.
cleaner IMO.
Costas
From 4c84afd631ad09011b237790599e1c320852f82d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Costas Argyris
Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2023 10:34:14 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] libiberty: pex-unix.c: Make pex_unix_cleanup signature always
match body.
Signed-off-by: Costas Argyris
---
libiberty/pex-unix.c
