Re: [PATCH] reorg.c: use vec instead of rtx_insn_list for the delay insn list

2015-10-06 Thread Oleg Endo
On Tue, 2015-10-06 at 15:59 +0200, Bernd Schmidt wrote: > On 10/06/2015 03:37 PM, tbsaunde+...@tbsaunde.org wrote: > > This seems a bit cleaner, and should involve less allocation. > > I agree this is good. rtx_insn_list should die. > > > I tested there was no regressions for sh-sim with all

Re: [PATCH] reorg.c: use vec instead of rtx_insn_list for the delay insn list

2015-10-06 Thread Bernd Schmidt
On 10/06/2015 04:50 PM, Oleg Endo wrote: On Tue, 2015-10-06 at 15:59 +0200, Bernd Schmidt wrote: On 10/06/2015 03:37 PM, tbsaunde+...@tbsaunde.org wrote: This seems a bit cleaner, and should involve less allocation. I agree this is good. rtx_insn_list should die. I tested there was no

Re: [PATCH] reorg.c: use vec instead of rtx_insn_list for the delay insn list

2015-10-06 Thread Bernd Schmidt
On 10/06/2015 03:37 PM, tbsaunde+...@tbsaunde.org wrote: This seems a bit cleaner, and should involve less allocation. I agree this is good. rtx_insn_list should die. I tested there was no regressions for sh-sim with all languages accept ada,lto,fortran, ok? Could you please also build a

[PATCH] reorg.c: use vec instead of rtx_insn_list for the delay insn list

2015-10-06 Thread tbsaunde+gcc
From: Trevor Saunders Hi, This seems a bit cleaner, and should involve less allocation. I tested there was no regressions for sh-sim with all languages accept ada,lto,fortran, ok? Trev gcc/ChangeLog: 2015-10-06 Trevor Saunders