This fixes an oversight to when removing the hard limits on using
generic vectors for the vectorizer to enable both SLP and BB
vectorization to use those. The vectorizer relies on vector lowering
to expand plus, minus and negate to bit operations but vector
lowering has a hard limit on the minimum
Richard Biener via Gcc-patches writes:
> This fixes an oversight to when removing the hard limits on using
> generic vectors for the vectorizer to enable both SLP and BB
> vectorization to use those. The vectorizer relies on vector lowering
> to expand plus, minus and negate to bit operations but
On Fri, 10 Feb 2023, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> Richard Biener via Gcc-patches writes:
> > This fixes an oversight to when removing the hard limits on using
> > generic vectors for the vectorizer to enable both SLP and BB
> > vectorization to use those. The vectorizer relies on vector lowering
>
On 2/10/23 04:02, Richard Biener via Gcc-patches wrote:
This fixes an oversight to when removing the hard limits on using
generic vectors for the vectorizer to enable both SLP and BB
vectorization to use those. The vectorizer relies on vector lowering
to expand plus, minus and negate to bit o
On Mon, 13 Feb 2023, Jeff Law wrote:
>
>
> On 2/10/23 04:02, Richard Biener via Gcc-patches wrote:
> > This fixes an oversight to when removing the hard limits on using
> > generic vectors for the vectorizer to enable both SLP and BB
> > vectorization to use those. The vectorizer relies on vect
On 2/13/23 07:51, Richard Biener wrote:
On Mon, 13 Feb 2023, Jeff Law wrote:
On 2/10/23 04:02, Richard Biener via Gcc-patches wrote:
This fixes an oversight to when removing the hard limits on using
generic vectors for the vectorizer to enable both SLP and BB
vectorization to use those.