On Fri, 2020-04-17 at 08:18 -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 9:41 AM Jeff Law wrote:
> > On Wed, 2020-04-08 at 09:23 -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
> > > On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 9:16 AM Jeff Law wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 2020-03-31 at 08:11 -0700, H.J. Lu via Gcc-patches wrote:
> > > > > Since c
BOL_REF_DLLIMPORT_P
> > (op)
> > But I need to use DECL_DLLIMPORT_P (cfun->decl)).
> Sigh. In that case I guess the patch is OK as-is.
>
I'd like to backport this wrong code fix to GCC 9/8 branches.
Is it OK for GCC 9/8 branches?
Thanks.
--
H.J.
From f86
On Wed, 2020-04-08 at 09:23 -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 9:16 AM Jeff Law wrote:
> > On Tue, 2020-03-31 at 08:11 -0700, H.J. Lu via Gcc-patches wrote:
> > > Since constant_call_address_operand has
> > >
> > > ;; Test for a pc-relative call operand
> > > (define_predicate "consta
On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 9:16 AM Jeff Law wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2020-03-31 at 08:11 -0700, H.J. Lu via Gcc-patches wrote:
> > Since constant_call_address_operand has
> >
> > ;; Test for a pc-relative call operand
> > (define_predicate "constant_call_address_operand"
> > (match_code "symbol_ref")
> >
On Tue, 2020-03-31 at 08:11 -0700, H.J. Lu via Gcc-patches wrote:
> Since constant_call_address_operand has
>
> ;; Test for a pc-relative call operand
> (define_predicate "constant_call_address_operand"
> (match_code "symbol_ref")
> {
> if (ix86_cmodel == CM_LARGE || ix86_cmodel == CM_LARGE_PI
Since constant_call_address_operand has
;; Test for a pc-relative call operand
(define_predicate "constant_call_address_operand"
(match_code "symbol_ref")
{
if (ix86_cmodel == CM_LARGE || ix86_cmodel == CM_LARGE_PIC
|| flag_force_indirect_call)
return false;
if (TARGET_DLLIMPORT_DE
