Hi,
on 2023/9/25 09:57, HAO CHEN GUI wrote:
> Hi Kewen,
>
> 在 2023/9/18 15:34, Kewen.Lin 写道:
>> hanks for checking! So for P7, this patch looks neutral, but for P8 and
>> later, it may cause some few differences in code gen. I'm curious that how
>> many total object files and different object f
Hi Kewen,
在 2023/9/18 15:34, Kewen.Lin 写道:
> hanks for checking! So for P7, this patch looks neutral, but for P8 and
> later, it may cause some few differences in code gen. I'm curious that how
> many total object files and different object files were checked and found
> on P8?
P8 with -O2, fo
Hi Haochen,
on 2023/9/14 16:35, HAO CHEN GUI wrote:
> Hi Kewen,
>
> 在 2023/9/12 17:33, Kewen.Lin 写道:
>> Ok, at least regression testing doesn't expose any needs to do disparaging
>> for this. Could you also test this patch with SPEC2017 for P7 and P8
>> separately at options like -O2 or -O3, to
Hi Kewen,
在 2023/9/12 17:33, Kewen.Lin 写道:
> Ok, at least regression testing doesn't expose any needs to do disparaging
> for this. Could you also test this patch with SPEC2017 for P7 and P8
> separately at options like -O2 or -O3, to see if there is any assembly
> change, and if yes filtering ou
Hi Haochen,
on 2023/9/4 13:33, HAO CHEN GUI wrote:
> Hi,
> This patch enables SImode in FP registers on P7. Instruction "fctiw"
> stores its integer output in an FP register. So SImode in FP register
> needs be enabled on P7 if we want support "fctiw" on P7.
>
> The test case is in the second
Hi,
This patch enables SImode in FP registers on P7. Instruction "fctiw"
stores its integer output in an FP register. So SImode in FP register
needs be enabled on P7 if we want support "fctiw" on P7.
The test case is in the second patch which implements 32bit inline
lrint.
Compared to the l
