Christophe Lyon writes:
> Hi Andrea,
>
> Minor comments below:
>
> On 4/28/23 13:29, Andrea Corallo via Gcc-patches wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> this patch fixes the vstrwq* MVE instrinsics failing to emit the
>> correct sequence of instruction due to a missing predicates. Also the
> nit: you have a typo
Christophe Lyon writes:
> Hi Andrea,
>
> Minor comments below:
>
> On 4/28/23 13:29, Andrea Corallo via Gcc-patches wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> this patch fixes the vstrwq* MVE instrinsics failing to emit the
>> correct sequence of instruction due to a missing predicates. Also the
> nit: you have a typo
Hi Andrea,
Minor comments below:
On 4/28/23 13:29, Andrea Corallo via Gcc-patches wrote:
Hi all,
this patch fixes the vstrwq* MVE instrinsics failing to emit the
correct sequence of instruction due to a missing predicates. Also the
nit: you have a typo, should be "predicate"
immediate range
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrea Corallo
> Sent: Friday, April 28, 2023 12:30 PM
> To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Cc: Kyrylo Tkachov ; Richard Earnshaw
> ; Andrea Corallo
> Subject: [PATCH 02/10] arm: Fix vstrwq* backend + testsuite
>
> Hi all,
>
>
Hi all,
this patch fixes the vstrwq* MVE instrinsics failing to emit the
correct sequence of instruction due to a missing predicates. Also the
immediate range is fixed to be multiples of 2 up between [-252, 252].
Best Regards
Andrea
gcc/ChangeLog:
* config/arm/constraints.md (mve_vld
