Re: [PATCH 2/2] aarch64 back-end changes

2019-05-15 Thread Kugan Vivekanandarajah
Hi Richard, On Wed, 15 May 2019 at 23:24, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote: > > On 15/05/2019 13:48, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote: > > On 15/05/2019 03:39, kugan.vivekanandara...@linaro.org wrote: > >> From: Kugan Vivekanandarajah > >> > > > > The subject line to this email is not helpful. Why

Re: [PATCH 2/2] aarch64 back-end changes

2019-05-15 Thread Richard Earnshaw (lists)
On 15/05/2019 13:48, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote: > On 15/05/2019 03:39, kugan.vivekanandara...@linaro.org wrote: >> From: Kugan Vivekanandarajah >> > > The subject line to this email is not helpful. Why should I be > interested in reviewing this patch? Also, why does it claim to be 2/2 >

Re: [PATCH 2/2] aarch64 back-end changes

2019-05-15 Thread Richard Earnshaw (lists)
On 15/05/2019 03:39, kugan.vivekanandara...@linaro.org wrote: > From: Kugan Vivekanandarajah > The subject line to this email is not helpful. Why should I be interested in reviewing this patch? Also, why does it claim to be 2/2 when there's no 1/2 to go with it? Please include with all

[PATCH 2/2] aarch64 back-end changes

2019-05-14 Thread kugan . vivekanandarajah
From: Kugan Vivekanandarajah gcc/ChangeLog: 2019-05-15 Kugan Vivekanandarajah PR target/88834 * config/aarch64/aarch64.c (aarch64_classify_address): Relax allow_reg_index_p. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: 2019-05-15 Kugan Vivekanandarajah PR target/88834