On 05/19/2016 01:16 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 05:13:25PM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 01:35:16PM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 11:20:29AM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
* function.c (make_split_prologue_seq,
On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 02:28:15AM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> The following fixes it, tested on x86_64-linux. Is it okay for trunk?
>
> (It only happens for targets that have a splitter gated by epilogue_done
> for their eh_return pattern).
>
>
> Segher
>
>
> 2016-05-19 Segher
On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 09:16:26AM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 05:13:25PM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 01:35:16PM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 11:20:29AM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
> > > > >> > *
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 05:13:25PM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 01:35:16PM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 11:20:29AM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
> > > >> > * function.c (make_split_prologue_seq, make_prologue_seq,
> > > >> >
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 01:35:16PM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 11:20:29AM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
> > >> > * function.c (make_split_prologue_seq, make_prologue_seq,
> > >> > make_epilogue_seq): New functions, factored out from...
> > >> >
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 11:20:29AM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
> >> > * function.c (make_split_prologue_seq, make_prologue_seq,
> >> > make_epilogue_seq): New functions, factored out from...
> >> > (thread_prologue_and_epilogue_insns): Here.
> >>
> >> It breaks x86:
> >
> > Are
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 11:20 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 11:11 AM, Segher Boessenkool
> wrote:
>> On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 10:17:32AM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>> On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 6:09 PM, Segher Boessenkool
>>>
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 11:11 AM, Segher Boessenkool
wrote:
> On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 10:17:32AM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 6:09 PM, Segher Boessenkool
>> wrote:
>> > Make new functions make_split_prologue_seq,
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 10:17:32AM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 6:09 PM, Segher Boessenkool
> wrote:
> > Make new functions make_split_prologue_seq, make_prologue_seq, and
> > make_epilogue_seq.
> >
> > Tested as in the previous patch; is this okay
On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 6:09 PM, Segher Boessenkool
wrote:
> Make new functions make_split_prologue_seq, make_prologue_seq, and
> make_epilogue_seq.
>
> Tested as in the previous patch; is this okay for trunk?
>
>
> Segher
>
>
> 2016-05-16 Segher Boessenkool
On 05/16/2016 07:09 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
Make new functions make_split_prologue_seq, make_prologue_seq, and
make_epilogue_seq.
Tested as in the previous patch; is this okay for trunk?
Segher
2016-05-16 Segher Boessenkool
* function.c
Make new functions make_split_prologue_seq, make_prologue_seq, and
make_epilogue_seq.
Tested as in the previous patch; is this okay for trunk?
Segher
2016-05-16 Segher Boessenkool
* function.c (make_split_prologue_seq, make_prologue_seq,
12 matches
Mail list logo