The 09/23/2020 21:45, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 9/23/20 11:45 AM, Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches wrote:
> > On 9/23/20 9:44 AM, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
> > > The 09/23/2020 09:22, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
> > > > The 09/21/2020 12:45, Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches wrote:
> > > > > On 9/21/20 12:20 PM, Vaseeharan
On 9/23/20 11:45 AM, Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches wrote:
On 9/23/20 9:44 AM, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
The 09/23/2020 09:22, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
The 09/21/2020 12:45, Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches wrote:
On 9/21/20 12:20 PM, Vaseeharan Vinayagamoorthy wrote:
After this patch, I am seeing this
On 9/23/20 9:44 AM, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
The 09/23/2020 09:22, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
The 09/21/2020 12:45, Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches wrote:
On 9/21/20 12:20 PM, Vaseeharan Vinayagamoorthy wrote:
After this patch, I am seeing this -Warray-parameter error:
In file included from
The 09/23/2020 09:22, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
> The 09/21/2020 12:45, Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches wrote:
> > On 9/21/20 12:20 PM, Vaseeharan Vinayagamoorthy wrote:
> > > After this patch, I am seeing this -Warray-parameter error:
> > >
> > > In file included from ../include/pthread.h:1,
> > >
The 09/21/2020 12:45, Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches wrote:
> On 9/21/20 12:20 PM, Vaseeharan Vinayagamoorthy wrote:
> > After this patch, I am seeing this -Warray-parameter error:
> >
> > In file included from ../include/pthread.h:1,
> > from ../sysdeps/nptl/thread_db.h:25,
> >
On 9/21/20 12:20 PM, Vaseeharan Vinayagamoorthy wrote:
After this patch, I am seeing this -Warray-parameter error:
In file included from ../include/pthread.h:1,
from ../sysdeps/nptl/thread_db.h:25,
from ../nptl/descr.h:32,
from
After this patch, I am seeing this -Warray-parameter error:
In file included from ../include/pthread.h:1,
from ../sysdeps/nptl/thread_db.h:25,
from ../nptl/descr.h:32,
from ../sysdeps/aarch64/nptl/tls.h:44,
from
On 9/17/20 4:38 PM, Joseph Myers wrote:
On Wed, 16 Sep 2020, Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches wrote:
Attached is an updated revision of the patch. Besides the tweaks
above it also contains a cosmetic change to the warning issued
for mismatches in unspecified VLA bounds: it points at the decl
with
On Wed, 16 Sep 2020, Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches wrote:
> Attached is an updated revision of the patch. Besides the tweaks
> above it also contains a cosmetic change to the warning issued
> for mismatches in unspecified VLA bounds: it points at the decl
> with more of them to guide the user to
On 9/15/20 5:02 PM, Joseph Myers wrote:
On Wed, 9 Sep 2020, Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches wrote:
Joseph, do you have any concerns with or comments on the most
recent patch or is it okay as is?
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-August/552266.html
I'm not yet convinced by the
On Wed, 9 Sep 2020, Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches wrote:
> Joseph, do you have any concerns with or comments on the most
> recent patch or is it okay as is?
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-August/552266.html
I'm not yet convinced by the logic for extracting an array bound from
Joseph, do you have any concerns with or comments on the most
recent patch or is it okay as is?
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-August/552266.html
Martin
On 9/2/20 6:03 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
Ping: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-August/552266.html
On 8/25/20
Ping: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-August/552266.html
On 8/25/20 12:44 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
Joseph, do you have any more comments on the rest of the most recent
revision of the patch?
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-August/552266.html
Martin
On 8/19/20
Joseph, do you have any more comments on the rest of the most recent
revision of the patch?
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-August/552266.html
Martin
On 8/19/20 6:09 PM, Joseph Myers wrote:
On Wed, 19 Aug 2020, Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches wrote:
I think you need a while loop
On 8/19/20 6:09 PM, Joseph Myers wrote:
On Wed, 19 Aug 2020, Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches wrote:
I think you need a while loop there, not just an if, to account for the
case of multiple consecutive cdk_attrs. At least the GNU attribute syntax
direct-declarator:
[...]
(
On Wed, 19 Aug 2020, Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches wrote:
> > I think you need a while loop there, not just an if, to account for the
> > case of multiple consecutive cdk_attrs. At least the GNU attribute syntax
> >
> > direct-declarator:
> > [...]
> > ( gnu-attributes[opt] declarator
On 8/17/20 4:09 PM, Joseph Myers wrote:
On Thu, 13 Aug 2020, Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches wrote:
* Maybe cdk_pointer is followed by cdk_attrs before cdk_id. In this case
the code won't return.
I think I see the problem you're pointing out (I just don't see how
to trigger it or test that it
On Thu, 13 Aug 2020, Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches wrote:
> > * Maybe cdk_pointer is followed by cdk_attrs before cdk_id. In this case
> > the code won't return.
>
> I think I see the problem you're pointing out (I just don't see how
> to trigger it or test that it doesn't happen). If the tweak
On 8/12/20 5:19 PM, Joseph Myers wrote:
On Fri, 7 Aug 2020, Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches wrote:
I don't see anything in the tests in this patch to cover this sort of case
(arrays of pointers, including arrays of pointers to arrays etc.).
I've added a few test cases and reworked the
On Fri, 7 Aug 2020, Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches wrote:
> > I don't see anything in the tests in this patch to cover this sort of case
> > (arrays of pointers, including arrays of pointers to arrays etc.).
>
> I've added a few test cases and reworked the declarator parsing
>
On 7/29/20 12:12 PM, Joseph Myers wrote:
On Tue, 28 Jul 2020, Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches wrote:
+ /* A list of VLA variable bounds or null if not specified. */
+ tree vbchain = NULL_TREE;
+ if (parm->declarator->kind == cdk_array)
+ if (pd->kind != cdk_array)
+
On Tue, 28 Jul 2020, Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches wrote:
> + /* A list of VLA variable bounds or null if not specified. */
> + tree vbchain = NULL_TREE;
> + if (parm->declarator->kind == cdk_array)
> + if (pd->kind != cdk_array)
> + break;
> + /* Skip all constant
Patch 2 adds support for the internal attribute access specification
for array/VLA parameters to the C front end and two new options to
control warnings.
The attribute is added in two steps: first, push_parm_decl adds a new
attribute "arg spec" to each array parameter with a string describing
23 matches
Mail list logo
