On 09/27/2017 07:30 PM, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
> On 09/27/2017 03:05 AM, Rainer Orth wrote:
>> Hi Andreas,
>>
>>> On 09/27/2017 10:10 AM, Rainer Orth wrote:
Hi Andreas,
> On 09/26/2017 02:26 PM, Rainer Orth wrote:
>> Hi Andreas,
>>
>>> diff --git
On 09/26/2017 06:49 PM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> Andreas Krebbel writes:
...
> Sorry for the bikeshedding, but how about having a positive test
> like vect_can_peel instead? ! vect_no... can be hard to read in
> complex conditions. (There's already that problem
On 09/27/2017 03:05 AM, Rainer Orth wrote:
Hi Andreas,
On 09/27/2017 10:10 AM, Rainer Orth wrote:
Hi Andreas,
On 09/26/2017 02:26 PM, Rainer Orth wrote:
Hi Andreas,
diff --git a/gcc/doc/sourcebuild.texi b/gcc/doc/sourcebuild.texi
index 307c726..3acfd85 100644
---
Hi Andreas,
> On 09/27/2017 10:10 AM, Rainer Orth wrote:
>> Hi Andreas,
>>
>>> On 09/26/2017 02:26 PM, Rainer Orth wrote:
Hi Andreas,
> diff --git a/gcc/doc/sourcebuild.texi b/gcc/doc/sourcebuild.texi
> index 307c726..3acfd85 100644
> --- a/gcc/doc/sourcebuild.texi
>
On 09/27/2017 10:10 AM, Rainer Orth wrote:
> Hi Andreas,
>
>> On 09/26/2017 02:26 PM, Rainer Orth wrote:
>>> Hi Andreas,
>>>
diff --git a/gcc/doc/sourcebuild.texi b/gcc/doc/sourcebuild.texi
index 307c726..3acfd85 100644
--- a/gcc/doc/sourcebuild.texi
+++
Hi Andreas,
> On 09/26/2017 02:26 PM, Rainer Orth wrote:
>> Hi Andreas,
>>
>>> diff --git a/gcc/doc/sourcebuild.texi b/gcc/doc/sourcebuild.texi
>>> index 307c726..3acfd85 100644
>>> --- a/gcc/doc/sourcebuild.texi
>>> +++ b/gcc/doc/sourcebuild.texi
>>> @@ -1398,6 +1398,9 @@ Target supports a
On 09/26/2017 02:26 PM, Rainer Orth wrote:
> Hi Andreas,
>
>> diff --git a/gcc/doc/sourcebuild.texi b/gcc/doc/sourcebuild.texi
>> index 307c726..3acfd85 100644
>> --- a/gcc/doc/sourcebuild.texi
>> +++ b/gcc/doc/sourcebuild.texi
>> @@ -1398,6 +1398,9 @@ Target supports a vector misalign access.
>>
Andreas Krebbel writes:
> - vect_nopeel renamed to vect_no_peel
> - documentation added.
>
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>
> 2017-09-26 Andreas Krebbel
>
> * doc/sourcebuild.texi: Document vect_no_peel.
>
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>
>
Hi Andreas,
> diff --git a/gcc/doc/sourcebuild.texi b/gcc/doc/sourcebuild.texi
> index 307c726..3acfd85 100644
> --- a/gcc/doc/sourcebuild.texi
> +++ b/gcc/doc/sourcebuild.texi
> @@ -1398,6 +1398,9 @@ Target supports a vector misalign access.
> @item vect_no_align
> Target does not support a
- vect_nopeel renamed to vect_no_peel
- documentation added.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2017-09-26 Andreas Krebbel
* doc/sourcebuild.texi: Document vect_no_peel.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2017-09-26 Andreas Krebbel
*
Without peeling loops for vector alignment the vectorization costs are
lower and in some cases make the loop vectorizer cover optimizations
which otherwise would be handelt in slp instead.
This adds a new target check for that purpose.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2017-09-26 Andreas Krebbel
11 matches
Mail list logo