On Fri, Apr 08, 2022 at 03:09:00PM +0800, Kewen.Lin wrote:
> As PR103623 shows, it's a regression failure due to new built-in
> function framework, previously we guard __builtin_{un,}pack_{longdouble,
> ibm128} built-in functions under hard float, so they are unavailable
> with the given
on 2022/4/8 4:04 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 08, 2022 at 03:09:00PM +0800, Kewen.Lin wrote:
>> + /* Let's ignore all error messages about built-in function
>> + unsupported due to soft-float, since they are not test
>> + points here (this case is to check no ICE). */
>> + /*
On Fri, Apr 08, 2022 at 03:09:00PM +0800, Kewen.Lin wrote:
> + /* Let's ignore all error messages about built-in function
> + unsupported due to soft-float, since they are not test
> + points here (this case is to check no ICE). */
> + /* { dg-error ".*" "pr103623" { target *-*-* } .-19
Hi,
As PR103623 shows, it's a regression failure due to new built-in
function framework, previously we guard __builtin_{un,}pack_{longdouble,
ibm128} built-in functions under hard float, so they are unavailable
with the given configuration. While with new bif infrastructure, it
becomes available
