Segher Boessenkool writes:
> Hi!
>
> On Thu, Mar 09, 2023 at 12:09:59PM +, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>> This patch just splits some code out of make_compound_operation_int
>> into a new function called make_compound_operation_and. It is a
>> prerequisite for the fix for PR106594.
>>
>> It
Hi!
On Thu, Mar 09, 2023 at 12:09:59PM +, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> This patch just splits some code out of make_compound_operation_int
> into a new function called make_compound_operation_and. It is a
> prerequisite for the fix for PR106594.
>
> It might (or might not) make sense to put
This patch just splits some code out of make_compound_operation_int
into a new function called make_compound_operation_and. It is a
prerequisite for the fix for PR106594.
It might (or might not) make sense to put more of the existing
"and" handling into the new function, so that the