Re: [gomp4] Fix some broken tests

2015-11-11 Thread Cesar Philippidis
On 11/11/2015 05:40 AM, Nathan Sidwell wrote: > On 11/10/15 18:08, Cesar Philippidis wrote: >> On 11/10/2015 12:35 PM, Nathan Sidwell wrote: >>> I've committed this to gomp4. In preparing the reworked firstprivate >>> patch changes for gomp4's gimplify.c I discovered these testcases were >>>

Re: [gomp4] Fix some broken tests

2015-11-11 Thread Nathan Sidwell
On 11/11/15 09:50, Cesar Philippidis wrote: On 11/11/2015 05:40 AM, Nathan Sidwell wrote: On 11/10/15 18:08, Cesar Philippidis wrote: On 11/10/2015 12:35 PM, Nathan Sidwell wrote: I've committed this to gomp4. In preparing the reworked firstprivate patch changes for gomp4's gimplify.c I

Re: [gomp4] Fix some broken tests

2015-11-11 Thread Nathan Sidwell
On 11/10/15 18:08, Cesar Philippidis wrote: On 11/10/2015 12:35 PM, Nathan Sidwell wrote: I've committed this to gomp4. In preparing the reworked firstprivate patch changes for gomp4's gimplify.c I discovered these testcases were passing by accident, and lacked a data clause. It used to be

[gomp4] Fix some broken tests

2015-11-10 Thread Nathan Sidwell
I've committed this to gomp4. In preparing the reworked firstprivate patch changes for gomp4's gimplify.c I discovered these testcases were passing by accident, and lacked a data clause. nathan 2015-11-10 Nathan Sidwell *

Re: [gomp4] Fix some broken tests

2015-11-10 Thread Cesar Philippidis
On 11/10/2015 12:35 PM, Nathan Sidwell wrote: > I've committed this to gomp4. In preparing the reworked firstprivate > patch changes for gomp4's gimplify.c I discovered these testcases were > passing by accident, and lacked a data clause. It used to be if a reduction was on a parallel