On 06/08/11 22:51, Steve Ellcey wrote:
On Wed, 2011-06-08 at 22:19 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 01:16:26PM -0700, Steve Ellcey wrote:
On Wed, 2011-06-08 at 22:08 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 01:03:53PM -0700, Steve Ellcey wrote:
2011-06-08 Steve
On Wed, 2011-06-08 at 22:19 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 01:16:26PM -0700, Steve Ellcey wrote:
> > On Wed, 2011-06-08 at 22:08 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 01:03:53PM -0700, Steve Ellcey wrote:
> > > > 2011-06-08 Steve Ellcey
> > > >
> > > >
On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 01:16:26PM -0700, Steve Ellcey wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-06-08 at 22:08 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 01:03:53PM -0700, Steve Ellcey wrote:
> > > 2011-06-08 Steve Ellcey
> > >
> > > PR middle-end/49191
> > > * lib/target-supports.exp (check_effe
On Wed, 2011-06-08 at 22:08 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 01:03:53PM -0700, Steve Ellcey wrote:
> > 2011-06-08 Steve Ellcey
> >
> > PR middle-end/49191
> > * lib/target-supports.exp (check_effective_target_strict_align): New.
> > * gcc.dg/memcpy-3.c: Add dg-r
On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 01:03:53PM -0700, Steve Ellcey wrote:
> 2011-06-08 Steve Ellcey
>
> PR middle-end/49191
> * lib/target-supports.exp (check_effective_target_strict_align): New.
> * gcc.dg/memcpy-3.c: Add dg-require-effective-target strict_align.
Isn't the test backward
Here is a patch to skip gcc.dg/memcpy-3.c on platforms that define
STRICT_ALIGNMENT. It adds a new check_effective routine,
check_effective_target_strict_align that looks for a warning that will
only be produced on platforms that define STRICT_ALIGNMENT.
Technically, the test may not work if the
