On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 10:54 AM, FX fxcoud...@gmail.com wrote:
The attached patch fixes PR 62296
(https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62296). The Fortran
interpretation there was a bit confused (see links to comp.lang.fortran
thread from the PR), but the consensus is that the
10-day *ping* for my 3 Fortran patches:
- Handle invalid command line in EXECUTE_COMMAND_LINE
(https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-08/msg00758.html)
- Use libbacktrace in libgfortran
(https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-08/msg00762.html)
- Fix configure test for weakref support
Otherwise looks good, but strncat is C99, and we support targets which
don't have a C99 libc (been there, done that..). Since in this case
you're dealing with string literals rather than user input, it ought
to be safe to just use plain strcat (or strlen+memcpy, if you prefer).
Nope,
The attached patch fixes PR 62296
(https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62296). The Fortran
interpretation there was a bit confused (see links to comp.lang.fortran thread
from the PR), but the consensus is that the standard makes a difference between
the command-line returning with
