Re: [PATCH] [testsuite][arm] Fix cmse-15.c expected output

2022-10-03 Thread Richard Earnshaw via Gcc-patches
On 23/09/2022 09:43, Torbjörn SVENSSON via Gcc-patches wrote: The cmse-15.c testcase fails at -Os because ICF means that we generate secure3: b secure1 which is OK, but does not match the currently expected secure3: ... bx r[0-3] gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

Re: [PATCH] [testsuite][arm] Fix cmse-15.c expected output

2022-09-29 Thread Christophe Lyon via Gcc-patches
Hi Torbjörn, On 9/23/22 10:43, Torbjörn SVENSSON via Gcc-patches wrote: The cmse-15.c testcase fails at -Os because ICF means that we generate secure3: b secure1 which is OK, but does not match the currently expected secure3: ... bx r[0-3] gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

[PATCH] [testsuite][arm] Fix cmse-15.c expected output

2022-09-23 Thread Torbjörn SVENSSON via Gcc-patches
The cmse-15.c testcase fails at -Os because ICF means that we generate secure3: b secure1 which is OK, but does not match the currently expected secure3: ... bx r[0-3] gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * gcc.target/arm/cmse/cmse-15.c: Align with -Os improvements. Co-Au

Re: [testsuite][arm] Fix cmse-15.c expected output

2020-04-09 Thread Richard Sandiford
Christophe Lyon writes: > On Wed, 8 Apr 2020 at 11:48, Richard Sandiford > wrote: >> >> Christophe Lyon via Gcc-patches writes: >> > Hi, >> > >> > While checking Martin's fix for PR ipa/94445, he made me realize that >> > the cmse-15.c testcase still fails at -Os because ICF means that we >> > g

Re: [testsuite][arm] Fix cmse-15.c expected output

2020-04-08 Thread Christophe Lyon via Gcc-patches
On Wed, 8 Apr 2020 at 11:48, Richard Sandiford wrote: > > Christophe Lyon via Gcc-patches writes: > > Hi, > > > > While checking Martin's fix for PR ipa/94445, he made me realize that > > the cmse-15.c testcase still fails at -Os because ICF means that we > > generate > > nonsecure2: > >

Re: [testsuite][arm] Fix cmse-15.c expected output

2020-04-08 Thread Richard Sandiford
Christophe Lyon via Gcc-patches writes: > Hi, > > While checking Martin's fix for PR ipa/94445, he made me realize that > the cmse-15.c testcase still fails at -Os because ICF means that we > generate > nonsecure2: > b nonsecure0 > > which is OK, but does not match the currently expe

Re: [testsuite][arm] Fix cmse-15.c expected output

2020-04-07 Thread Christophe Lyon via Gcc-patches
On Tue, 7 Apr 2020 at 12:31, Andre Vieira (lists) wrote: > > On 06/04/2020 16:12, Christophe Lyon via Gcc-patches wrote: > > Hi, > > > > While checking Martin's fix for PR ipa/94445, he made me realize that > > the cmse-15.c testcase still fails at -Os because ICF means that we > > generate > > no

Re: [testsuite][arm] Fix cmse-15.c expected output

2020-04-07 Thread Andre Vieira (lists)
On 06/04/2020 16:12, Christophe Lyon via Gcc-patches wrote: Hi, While checking Martin's fix for PR ipa/94445, he made me realize that the cmse-15.c testcase still fails at -Os because ICF means that we generate nonsecure2: b nonsecure0 which is OK, but does not match the currentl

[testsuite][arm] Fix cmse-15.c expected output

2020-04-06 Thread Christophe Lyon via Gcc-patches
Hi, While checking Martin's fix for PR ipa/94445, he made me realize that the cmse-15.c testcase still fails at -Os because ICF means that we generate nonsecure2: b nonsecure0 which is OK, but does not match the currently expected nonsecure2: ... bl __gnu_cmse_nonsecure