On 09/27/2017 09:17 AM, Tsimbalist, Igor V wrote:
Updated version #3.
diff --git a/gcc/doc/extend.texi b/gcc/doc/extend.texi
index e52a1ea..accba40 100644
--- a/gcc/doc/extend.texi
+++ b/gcc/doc/extend.texi
@@ -5655,6 +5655,14 @@ compiled with the @option{-fcf-protection=branch}
option. The
c
On 09/27/2017 09:17 AM, Tsimbalist, Igor V wrote:
>>
>
> 0005-Add-x86-CET-documentation.patch
>
>
> From dda22b06a3a5bde9b0dc57585d878db520769510 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Igor Tsimbalist
> Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2017 13:55:03 +0300
> Subject: [PATCH 5/6] Add x86 CET documentation.
>
> gcc/
On 09/27/2017 11:01 AM, Joseph Myers wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Sep 2017, Florian Weimer wrote:
>
>> This is part of the ABI GCC implements, so it has to be documented somewhere,
>> and not just as part of the GCC source code.
>>
>> CET is not properly described in the ABI supplement and I don't think th
On Wed, 27 Sep 2017, Florian Weimer wrote:
> This is part of the ABI GCC implements, so it has to be documented somewhere,
> and not just as part of the GCC source code.
>
> CET is not properly described in the ABI supplement and I don't think this
> will change, so detailed documentation in the
On 09/27/2017 02:52 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
On 09/27/2017 05:40 AM, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
+@emph{x86 implementation:} when @option{-fcf-protection} option is
+specified the compiler inserts an ENDBR instruction at function's
+prologue if the function's type does not have the @code{nocf_chec
Updated version #3.
> -Original Message-
> From: Sandra Loosemore [mailto:san...@codesourcery.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2017 5:41 AM
> To: Tsimbalist, Igor V ; Uros Bizjak
>
> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: Re: 0005-Part-5.-Add-x86-CET-documentati
> -Original Message-
> From: Florian Weimer [mailto:fwei...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2017 10:52 AM
> To: Sandra Loosemore ; Tsimbalist, Igor V
> ; Uros Bizjak
> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: Re: 0005-Part-5.-Add-x86-CET-documentation
>
On 09/27/2017 05:40 AM, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
+@emph{x86 implementation:} when @option{-fcf-protection} option is
+specified the compiler inserts an ENDBR instruction at function's
+prologue if the function's type does not have the @code{nocf_check}
+attribute and addresses to which indirect c
On 09/26/2017 07:47 AM, Tsimbalist, Igor V wrote:
Here is a new version of the patch.
diff --git a/gcc/doc/extend.texi b/gcc/doc/extend.texi
index a374890..a900ed1 100644
--- a/gcc/doc/extend.texi
+++ b/gcc/doc/extend.texi
@@ -5655,6 +5655,13 @@ compiled with the @option{-fcf-protection=branch}
Here is a new version of the patch.
Igor
> -Original Message-
> From: Sandra Loosemore [mailto:san...@codesourcery.com]
> Sent: Monday, September 25, 2017 5:43 AM
> To: Uros Bizjak ; Tsimbalist, Igor V
>
> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: Re: 000
On 09/20/2017 08:13 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 11:20 AM, Tsimbalist, Igor V
wrote:
Uros, could you please review this patch as it's a part of x86 specific changes
you have reviewed already.
Please proofread and spell-check the text. There are grammatical errors, e.g.:
[sn
On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 11:20 AM, Tsimbalist, Igor V
wrote:
> Uros, could you please review this patch as it's a part of x86 specific
> changes you have reviewed already.
Please proofread and spell-check the text. There are grammatical errors, e.g.:
+When compiled with the @option{-finstrument-
alist, Igor V
> Subject: 0005-Part-5.-Add-x86-CET-documentation
>
> Part#5. Add x86 CET documentation.
Part#5. Add x86 CET documentation.
0005-Part-5.-Add-x86-CET-documentation.patch
Description: 0005-Part-5.-Add-x86-CET-documentation.patch
14 matches
Mail list logo
