Richard Biener writes:
> On Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 3:35 AM, Doug Gilmore
> wrote:
> > My commit r240439 didn't handle the situation where setting --param
> > prefetch-latency=0 can cause the prefetch address to be the same as
> > the original address. In this case, no copying of points-to
> > infor
On Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 3:35 AM, Doug Gilmore wrote:
> My commit r240439 didn't handle the situation where setting
> --param prefetch-latency=0 can cause the prefetch address to
> be the same as the original address. In this case, no
> copying of points-to information should be done.
>
> Bootstrap
PM
> To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Christophe Lyon
> Subject: Fix PR tree-optimization/77808, ICE in
> duplicate_ssa_name_ptr_info, at tree-ssanames.c:630 starting with
> r240439
>
> My commit r240439 didn't handle the situation where setting
> --param prefetch-latency=0 can cau
istophe,
>>>>>
>>>>>> From: Christophe Lyon [christophe.l...@linaro.org]
>>>>>> Sent: Saturday, October 01, 2016 7:57 AM
>>>>>> To: Doug Gilmore
>>>>>> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
>>>>>> Subjec
>From: Christophe Lyon [christophe.l...@linaro.org]
>Sent: Monday, October 03, 2016 11:23 AM
>To: Doug Gilmore
>Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
>Subject: Re: Fix PR tree-optimization/77808, ICE in
>duplicate_ssa_name_ptr_info, at tree-ssanames.c:630 starting with r240439
>
>On
57 AM
>>>> To: Doug Gilmore
>>>> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
>>>> Subject: Re: Fix PR tree-optimization/77808, ICE in
>>>> duplicate_ssa_name_ptr_info, at tree-ssanames.c:630 starting with r240439
>>>>
>>>> Hi Doug,
>>>&
>From: Christophe Lyon [christophe.l...@linaro.org]
>Sent: Monday, October 03, 2016 12:05 AM
>To: Doug Gilmore
>Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
>Subject: Re: Fix PR tree-optimization/77808, ICE in
>duplicate_ssa_name_ptr_info, at tree-ssanames.c:630 starting with r240439
>
>On
x PR tree-optimization/77808, ICE in
>> duplicate_ssa_name_ptr_info, at tree-ssanames.c:630 starting with r240439
>>
>> Hi Doug,
>>
>> ...
>> I can confirm that your patch fixes the ICE I was seeing.
>>
>> However, the new testcase does not pass on low end
>> architect
Hi Christophe,
> From: Christophe Lyon [christophe.l...@linaro.org]
> Sent: Saturday, October 01, 2016 7:57 AM
> To: Doug Gilmore
> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: Re: Fix PR tree-optimization/77808, ICE in
> duplicate_ssa_name_ptr_info, at tree-ssanames.c:630 sta
Hi Doug,
On 1 October 2016 at 03:35, Doug Gilmore wrote:
> My commit r240439 didn't handle the situation where setting
> --param prefetch-latency=0 can cause the prefetch address to
> be the same as the original address. In this case, no
> copying of points-to information should be done.
>
> Bo
in
duplicate_ssa_name_ptr_info, at tree-ssanames.c:630 starting with
r240439
My commit r240439 didn't handle the situation where setting
--param prefetch-latency=0 can cause the prefetch address to
be the same as the original address. In this case, no
copying of points-to information shou
It looks like my original message was dropped, resending -- Doug
From: Doug Gilmore
Sent: Friday, September 30, 2016 6:35 PM
To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Christophe Lyon
Subject: Fix PR tree-optimization/77808, ICE in duplicate_ssa_name_ptr_info, at
tree
My commit r240439 didn't handle the situation where setting
--param prefetch-latency=0 can cause the prefetch address to
be the same as the original address. In this case, no
copying of points-to information should be done.
Bootstrapped and regression tested on x86_64-linux, ok for
trunk?
Doug
F
13 matches
Mail list logo
