On Wed, 17 Feb 2016, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Feb 2016, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On 02/17/2016 02:18 PM, Daniel Gutson wrote:
> > > On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 5:46 AM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> >
> > > > FYI. This causes gfc_add_interface_mapping in
On Wed, 17 Feb 2016, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
>
>
> On 02/17/2016 02:18 PM, Daniel Gutson wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 5:46 AM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
>
> > > FYI. This causes gfc_add_interface_mapping in fortrant/trans-expr.c to
> > > be miscompiled for aarch64-linux-gnu.
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 02:45:16PM +0100, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
>
>
> On 02/17/2016 02:18 PM, Daniel Gutson wrote:
> >On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 5:46 AM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
>
> >>FYI. This causes gfc_add_interface_mapping in fortrant/trans-expr.c to
> >>be miscompiled for
On 02/17/2016 02:18 PM, Daniel Gutson wrote:
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 5:46 AM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
FYI. This causes gfc_add_interface_mapping in fortrant/trans-expr.c to
be miscompiled for aarch64-linux-gnu. I am still debugging it and
trying to get a smaller testcase.
, NULL);
>> + bitfield_stmt_bfcopy_pair *p_st_cpy;
>> + unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT mrg_off;
>> + p_st_cpy = bf_stmnt_cpy->find (_cpy);
>> + if (p_st_cpy)
>> + cc = p_st_cpy->copy;
>> +
>> + if (cc
: Thursday, October 16, 2014 4:09 AM
To: Zoran Jovanovic
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Richard Biener; Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add a new option -fmerge-bitfields (patch / doc
inside)
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 3:28 AM, Zoran Jovanovic
zoran.jovano...@imgtec.com wrote
bool using_eh_for_cleanups_p (void);
Regards,
Zoran
From: Andrew Pinski [pins...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2014 4:09 AM
To: Zoran Jovanovic
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Richard Biener; Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add a new option -fmerge-bitfields (patch / doc
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 3:28 AM, Zoran Jovanovic
zoran.jovano...@imgtec.com wrote:
Hello,
Updated doc/invoke.texi by stating that new option is enabled by default at
-O2 and higher.
Also, -fmerge-bitfields added to the list of optimization flags enabled by
default at -O2 and higher.
Hello,
Updated doc/invoke.texi by stating that new option is enabled by default at -O2
and higher.
Also, -fmerge-bitfields added to the list of optimization flags enabled by
default at -O2 and higher.
Regards,
Zoran Jovanovic
On Thu, 17 Apr 2014 11:59:16 +
Zoran Jovanovic zoran.jovano...@imgtec.com wrote:
--- a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
+++ b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
@@ -7789,6 +7789,11 @@ pointer alignment information.
This pass only operates on local scalar variables and is enabled by default
at @option{-O} and
Hello,
My apologies for inconvenience.
Removed every appearance of -ftree-bitfield-merge from the patch and fixed an
issue with unions.
The rest of the patch is the same as before.
Regards,
Zoran Jovanovic
: Re: [PATCH] Add a new option -fmerge-bitfields (patch / doc inside)
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 8:38 AM, Zoran Jovanovic
zoran.jovano...@imgtec.com wrote:
Hello,
This is new patch version.
Lowering is applied only for bit-fields copy sequences that are merged.
Data structure representing bit-field
Hello,
This is new patch version.
Lowering is applied only for bit-fields copy sequences that are merged.
Data structure representing bit-field copy sequences is renamed and reduced in
size.
Optimization turned on by default for -O2 and higher.
Some comments fixed.
Benchmarking performed on
On 16 April 2014 13:38, Zoran Jovanovic zoran.jovano...@imgtec.com wrote:
Hello,
This is new patch version.
The comment from the previous iteration still holds true:
+@item -fbitfield-merge
you are talking about '-fmerge-bitfields' up until here.
Please fix all occurances of bitfield-merge,
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 8:38 AM, Zoran Jovanovic
zoran.jovano...@imgtec.com wrote:
Hello,
This is new patch version.
Lowering is applied only for bit-fields copy sequences that are merged.
Data structure representing bit-field copy sequences is renamed and reduced
in size.
Optimization
15 matches
Mail list logo