Hi, Han.
It's awesome that some one want to optimize dynamic LMUL feature of GCC.
I knew this feature is not stable yet and I failed to find the time to optimize
it (Still busy with fixing bugs).
Could you give me more details why this patch can refine those 2 cases with
picking larger LMUL (I
Hi juzhe,
The live ranges are represented as [def_point, last_use_point] in code.
For example:
0: _2 = _x1 + _x2
1: _3 = _y1 + _y2
2: _1 = _2 + _3
3: _4 = _1 + x1
Origin:
live ranges:
_1: [2, 3]
_2: [0, 2]
_3: [1, 2]
_x1:[0, 3]
max live regs calc:
_1 _2 _3 _x1
0 x x
1 x
On 12/20/23 04:17, juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai wrote:
I see. LGTM. Thanks for explanation.
I will ask Li Pan commit it for you.
The patch from Demin didn't specify if it had been regression tested.
All patches must be regression tested and an indication that the test
passed and on what target mus
Hi Jeff,
Thanks for reminding this.
Regression test info will be added to commit log in following patches.
Demin
On 2023/12/20 23:28, Jeff Law wrote:
>
>
> On 12/20/23 04:17, juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai wrote:
>> I see. LGTM. Thanks for explanation.
>>
>> I will ask Li Pan commit it for you.
> The pa
I see. LGTM. Thanks for explanation.
I will ask Li Pan commit it for you.
Thanks.
juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
From: Demin Han
Date: 2023-12-20 19:10
To: juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai; gcc-patches
CC: pan2.li
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Fix calculation of max live vregs
Hi juzhe,
The live ranges are
Committed, thanks all.
Pan
From: juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2023 7:18 PM
To: demin.han ; gcc-patches
Cc: Li, Pan2
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Fix calculation of max live vregs
I see. LGTM. Thanks for explanation.
I will ask Li Pan commit it for you.
Thanks
Ok. Thanks Jeff reminding me.
Will be carefull next time.
juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
From: Jeff Law
Date: 2023-12-20 23:28
To: juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai; demin.han; gcc-patches
CC: pan2.li
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Fix calculation of max live vregs
On 12/20/23 04:17, juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai wrote
