On 20/01/15 13:26, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:
On Jan 20, 2015, at 1:24 PM, Richard Earnshaw rearn...@arm.com wrote:
...
In general, how should someone tuning the compiler for this parameter
select a value that isn't one of (-1, m_i_q_d+1)?
From my experiments it seems there are 4 reasonable
On 19/01/15 18:14, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:
On Jan 19, 2015, at 6:05 PM, Richard Earnshaw rearn...@arm.com wrote:
On 16/01/15 15:06, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:
@@ -1874,7 +1889,8 @@ const struct tune_params arm_cortex_a15_tune =
true, true, /* Prefer 32-bit
On 19/01/15 18:14, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:
On Jan 19, 2015, at 6:05 PM, Richard Earnshaw rearn...@arm.com wrote:
On 16/01/15 15:06, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:
@@ -1874,7 +1889,8 @@ const struct tune_params arm_cortex_a15_tune =
true, true, /* Prefer 32-bit
On Jan 20, 2015, at 1:24 PM, Richard Earnshaw rearn...@arm.com wrote:
...
In general, how should someone tuning the compiler for this parameter
select a value that isn't one of (-1, m_i_q_d+1)?
From my experiments it seems there are 4 reasonable values for the
parameter: (-1) autopref
On 20/01/15 13:26, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:
On Jan 20, 2015, at 1:24 PM, Richard Earnshaw rearn...@arm.com wrote:
...
In general, how should someone tuning the compiler for this parameter
select a value that isn't one of (-1, m_i_q_d+1)?
From my experiments it seems there are 4 reasonable
On 16/01/15 15:06, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:
@@ -1874,7 +1889,8 @@ const struct tune_params arm_cortex_a15_tune =
true, true, /* Prefer 32-bit encodings.
*/
true, /* Prefer Neon for
stringops. */
8,
On Jan 19, 2015, at 6:05 PM, Richard Earnshaw rearn...@arm.com wrote:
On 16/01/15 15:06, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:
@@ -1874,7 +1889,8 @@ const struct tune_params arm_cortex_a15_tune =
true, true, /* Prefer 32-bit encodings.
*/
true,
On Nov 19, 2014, at 12:27 PM, Ramana Radhakrishnan
ramana.radhakrish...@arm.com wrote:
Hi Ramana,
Hi Vladimir,
I still don't have SPEC2000/SPEC2006 benchmark numbers for this patch. Since
stage3 is about to finish, I'm going to commit the target independent part of
the patch now (it was
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 3:06 PM, Maxim Kuvyrkov
maxim.kuvyr...@linaro.org wrote:
On Nov 19, 2014, at 12:27 PM, Ramana Radhakrishnan
ramana.radhakrish...@arm.com wrote:
Hi Ramana,
Hi Vladimir,
I still don't have SPEC2000/SPEC2006 benchmark numbers for this patch. Since
stage3 is about
On 14/11/14 15:12, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:
On Nov 14, 2014, at 8:38 AM, Jeff Law l...@redhat.com wrote:
On 10/20/14 22:06, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:
Hi,
Ramana, this change requires benchmarking, which I can't easily do
at
the moment. I would appreciate any benchmarking results that you can
On Nov 19, 2014, at 12:27 PM, Ramana Radhakrishnan
ramana.radhakrish...@arm.com wrote:
On 14/11/14 15:12, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:
On Nov 14, 2014, at 8:38 AM, Jeff Law l...@redhat.com wrote:
On 10/20/14 22:06, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:
Hi,
Ramana, this change requires benchmarking, which I
On Nov 14, 2014, at 4:57 AM, Vladimir Makarov vmaka...@redhat.com wrote:
On 2014-10-21 12:06 AM, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:
...
I'd prefer symbolic constants for dont_delay. Also the address can contains
other parts, e.g. index for some targets. It is not necessary to change the
code but a
On Nov 14, 2014, at 8:38 AM, Jeff Law l...@redhat.com wrote:
On 10/20/14 22:06, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:
Hi,
Ramana, this change requires benchmarking, which I can't easily do
at
the moment. I would appreciate any benchmarking results that you can
share. In particular, the value of
On 11/14/14 08:12, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:
...
Can this be built on top of Bin's work for insn fusion? There's a
lot of commonality in the structure of the insns you care about.
He's already got a nice little priority function that I think you
could utilize to to ensure the insns with smaller
On 2014-10-21 12:06 AM, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:
Hi,
This patch adds auto-prefetcher modeling to GCC scheduler. The auto-prefetcher
model is currently enabled only for ARM Cortex-A15, since this is the only CPU
that I know of to have the hardware auto-prefetcher unit.
The documentation on the
On 10/20/14 22:06, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:
Hi,
Ramana, this change requires benchmarking, which I can't easily do
at
the moment. I would appreciate any benchmarking results that you can
share. In particular, the value of PARAM_SCHED_AUTOPREF_QUEUE_DEPTH
needs to be tuned/confirmed for Cortex-A15.
On Oct 21, 2014, at 8:06 AM, Maxim Kuvyrkov maxim.kuvyr...@linaro.org wrote:
Hi,
This patch adds auto-prefetcher modeling to GCC scheduler. The
auto-prefetcher model is currently enabled only for ARM Cortex-A15, since
this is the only CPU that I know of to have the hardware
17 matches
Mail list logo
