Hi,
+ else if (ref-type == REF_COMPONENT
ref-u.c.component-attr.function
+ ref-u.c.component-attr.proc_pointer
+ ref-u.c.component-attr.dimension)
I wonder whether one should take care of functions returning BT_CLASS, but I
think one doesn't need to.
ping!
2013/11/18 Janus Weil ja...@gcc.gnu.org:
Hi all,
here is a straightforward patch to teach 'get_expr_storage_size' about
type-bound procedures (which are handled internally as
procedure-pointer components of the corresponding vtab). In that sense
the patch should handle both TBPs as
Janus Weil wrote:
here is a straightforward patch to teach 'get_expr_storage_size' about
type-bound procedures (which are handled internally as
procedure-pointer components of the corresponding vtab). In that sense
the patch should handle both TBPs as well as PPCs.
Regtested on
Hi Tobias,
here is a straightforward patch to teach 'get_expr_storage_size' about
type-bound procedures (which are handled internally as
procedure-pointer components of the corresponding vtab). In that sense
the patch should handle both TBPs as well as PPCs.
Regtested on
Hi Janus,
Janus Weil wrote:
+ else if (ref-type == REF_COMPONENT
ref-u.c.component-attr.function
+ ref-u.c.component-attr.proc_pointer
+ ref-u.c.component-attr.dimension)
I wonder whether one should take care of functions returning BT_CLASS,
but I think one
