On Nov 18, 2013, at 3:09 AM, Vidya Praveen wrote:
>> Ok, let it bake on trunk and then you can back port it if no one screams.
>
> I think it has baked long enough. Could this be approved for 4.7 and 4.8 now?
Oh, that was pre-approval to back port, conditional on no fallout and no
screams… If
Mike,
On 25/10/13 00:37, Mike Stump wrote:
On Oct 24, 2013, at 2:26 AM, Vidya Praveen wrote:
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 06:40:28PM +0100, Mike Stump wrote:
On Oct 21, 2013, at 3:28 AM, Vidya Praveen wrote:
Tests gcc.dg/20050922-1.c and gcc.dg/20050922-2.c includes stdlib.h. This can
be a issue
On Fri, 25 Oct 2013, Mike Stump wrote:
> On Oct 24, 2013, at 7:33 PM, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
> > On Thu, 24 Oct 2013, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
> >> I too would like to include this change on those branches, as
> >> recent generic newlib changes has caused these tests to break
> >> (regress) fo
On Oct 24, 2013, at 7:33 PM, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Oct 2013, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
>> On Mon, 21 Oct 2013, Mike Stump wrote:
>>
>>> On Oct 21, 2013, at 3:28 AM, Vidya Praveen wrote:
Tests gcc.dg/20050922-1.c and gcc.dg/20050922-2.c includes stdlib.h. This
can
On Thu, 24 Oct 2013, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Oct 2013, Mike Stump wrote:
>
> > On Oct 21, 2013, at 3:28 AM, Vidya Praveen wrote:
> > > Tests gcc.dg/20050922-1.c and gcc.dg/20050922-2.c includes stdlib.h. This
> > > can
> > > be a issue especially since they define uint32_t.
> >
> >
On Oct 24, 2013, at 2:26 AM, Vidya Praveen wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 06:40:28PM +0100, Mike Stump wrote:
>> On Oct 21, 2013, at 3:28 AM, Vidya Praveen wrote:
>>> Tests gcc.dg/20050922-1.c and gcc.dg/20050922-2.c includes stdlib.h. This
>>> can
>>> be a issue especially since they define u
On Mon, 21 Oct 2013, Mike Stump wrote:
> On Oct 21, 2013, at 3:28 AM, Vidya Praveen wrote:
> > Tests gcc.dg/20050922-1.c and gcc.dg/20050922-2.c includes stdlib.h. This
> > can
> > be a issue especially since they define uint32_t.
>
> > OK for 4.7, 4.8?
>
> For release branches, you'd need to
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 05:47:44PM +0100, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 10/21/13 04:28, Vidya Praveen wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Tests gcc.dg/20050922-1.c and gcc.dg/20050922-2.c includes stdlib.h. This
> > can
> > be a issue especially since they define uint32_t. Testcase writing
> > guidelines
> > discou
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 06:40:28PM +0100, Mike Stump wrote:
> On Oct 21, 2013, at 3:28 AM, Vidya Praveen wrote:
> > Tests gcc.dg/20050922-1.c and gcc.dg/20050922-2.c includes stdlib.h. This
> > can
> > be a issue especially since they define uint32_t.
>
> > OK for 4.7, 4.8?
>
> For release bran
On Oct 21, 2013, at 3:28 AM, Vidya Praveen wrote:
> Tests gcc.dg/20050922-1.c and gcc.dg/20050922-2.c includes stdlib.h. This can
> be a issue especially since they define uint32_t.
> OK for 4.7, 4.8?
For release branches, you'd need to transition from the theoretical to the
practical. On whic
On 10/21/13 04:28, Vidya Praveen wrote:
Hello,
Tests gcc.dg/20050922-1.c and gcc.dg/20050922-2.c includes stdlib.h. This can
be a issue especially since they define uint32_t. Testcase writing guidelines
discourages such inclusion as well.
This patch replaces these #includes with manual declarat
11 matches
Mail list logo