I'm resending this because I forgot to dupe to gcc-patches and I'd like
one thread.
This should be pure commentary and documentation.
I hope I got all these. I grepped for DR and added
_GLIBCXX_RESOLVE_LIB_DEFECTS where it seemed needed.
I did not add in cases where DR mentions were more com
On 15 March 2014 14:46, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
> I'm resending this because I forgot to dupe to gcc-patches and I'd like one
> thread.
>
> This should be pure commentary and documentation.
>
> I hope I got all these. I grepped for DR and added
> _GLIBCXX_RESOLVE_LIB_DEFECTS where it seemed needed
On 03/16/2014 08:43 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 15 March 2014 14:46, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
I'm resending this because I forgot to dupe to gcc-patches and I'd like one
thread.
This should be pure commentary and documentation.
I hope I got all these. I grepped for DR and added
_GLIBCXX_RESO
On 16 March 2014 16:09, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
> OK, thinking further on it I actually agree with not mentioning DRs on a
> partially baked standard. We advertise that support for new standards is
> experimental.
I don't think it does any harm to add comments during the C++1y/C++1z
process to no
