On Fri, Jul 09, 2021 at 08:16:24AM +0200, Richard Biener via Gcc-patches wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 8, 2021 at 8:02 PM Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Ian,
> >
> > Yesterday's enhancement to -Warray-bounds has exposed a couple of
> > issues in libgo where the code writes into an
Hi Martin,
>>> while this patch does fix the libgo bootstrap failure, Go is completely
>>> broken: almost 1000 go.test failures and all libgo tests FAIL as well.
>>> Seen on both i386-pc-solaris2.11 and sparc-sun-solaris2.11.
>> FWIW, I see exactly the same failures on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, so
On 7/9/21 7:26 AM, Rainer Orth wrote:
Hi Martin,
Yesterday's enhancement to -Warray-bounds has exposed a couple of
issues in libgo where the code writes into an invalid constant
address that the warning is designed to flag.
On the assumption that those invalid addresses are deliberate,
the
On Thu, Jul 8, 2021 at 11:16 PM Richard Biener
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 8, 2021 at 8:02 PM Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Ian,
> >
> > Yesterday's enhancement to -Warray-bounds has exposed a couple of
> > issues in libgo where the code writes into an invalid constant
> > address
On 7/9/21 7:19 AM, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:
On 9 Jul 2021, at 09:16, Richard Biener via Gcc-patches
wrote:
On Thu, Jul 8, 2021 at 8:02 PM Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches
wrote:
Hi Ian,
Yesterday's enhancement to -Warray-bounds has exposed a couple of
issues in libgo where the code writes into
On 7/9/21 12:16 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Thu, Jul 8, 2021 at 8:02 PM Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches
wrote:
Hi Ian,
Yesterday's enhancement to -Warray-bounds has exposed a couple of
issues in libgo where the code writes into an invalid constant
address that the warning is designed to flag.
Hi Martin,
>> Yesterday's enhancement to -Warray-bounds has exposed a couple of
>> issues in libgo where the code writes into an invalid constant
>> address that the warning is designed to flag.
>>
>> On the assumption that those invalid addresses are deliberate,
>> the attached patch suppresses
> On 9 Jul 2021, at 09:16, Richard Biener via Gcc-patches
> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 8, 2021 at 8:02 PM Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Ian,
>>
>> Yesterday's enhancement to -Warray-bounds has exposed a couple of
>> issues in libgo where the code writes into an invalid constant
On Thu, Jul 8, 2021 at 8:02 PM Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>
> Hi Ian,
>
> Yesterday's enhancement to -Warray-bounds has exposed a couple of
> issues in libgo where the code writes into an invalid constant
> address that the warning is designed to flag.
>
> On the assumption that those
Hi Martin,
> Yesterday's enhancement to -Warray-bounds has exposed a couple of
> issues in libgo where the code writes into an invalid constant
> address that the warning is designed to flag.
>
> On the assumption that those invalid addresses are deliberate,
> the attached patch suppresses these
Hi Ian,
Yesterday's enhancement to -Warray-bounds has exposed a couple of
issues in libgo where the code writes into an invalid constant
address that the warning is designed to flag.
On the assumption that those invalid addresses are deliberate,
the attached patch suppresses these instances by
11 matches
Mail list logo
