On 2/27/20 10:33 AM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
On 2/26/20 5:00 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 2/25/20 4:09 PM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
We consider all TYPE_ARGUMENT_PACKS distinct types, leading to
problems with redeclarations.
I'd think that the bug is that we're treating them as types in the
first
On 2/26/20 5:00 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 2/25/20 4:09 PM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
We consider all TYPE_ARGUMENT_PACKS distinct types, leading to
problems with redeclarations.
I'd think that the bug is that we're treating them as types in the first
place; they aren't types, so they shouldn't
On 2/25/20 4:09 PM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
We consider all TYPE_ARGUMENT_PACKS distinct types, leading to problems
with redeclarations.
This patch fixes things by:
a) marking all such types for structural comparison
b) teaching structural_comptypes how to compare them.
1) It appears that
We consider all TYPE_ARGUMENT_PACKS distinct types, leading to problems
with redeclarations.
This patch fixes things by:
a) marking all such types for structural comparison
b) teaching structural_comptypes how to compare them.
1) It appears that NONTYPE_ARGUMENT_PACKS just work, I think
