On 10/1/21 15:52, Nick Huang wrote:
...the subject line for the commit should be the first line of the
commit message, followed by a blank line, followed by the description of
the patch; without the subject line, git format-patch thought your whole
description was the subject of the patch.
oh,
> ...the subject line for the commit should be the first line of the
> commit message, followed by a blank line, followed by the description of
> the patch; without the subject line, git format-patch thought your whole
> description was the subject of the patch.
oh, I didn't realize this without
On 10/1/21 11:10, Nick Huang wrote:
gcc-verify still fails with this version:
ERR: line should start with a tab: "PR c++/101783"
ERR: line should start with a tab: "* tree.c (cp_build_qualified_type_real):
Excluding typedef from error"
ERR: line should start with a tab: "PR
> gcc-verify still fails with this version:
>
> > ERR: line should start with a tab: "PR c++/101783"
> > ERR: line should start with a tab: "* tree.c
> > (cp_build_qualified_type_real): Excluding typedef from error"
> > ERR: line should start with a tab: "PR c++/101783"
> > ERR: line
On 9/30/21 14:24, nick huang wrote:
You may need to run contrib/gcc-git-customization.sh to get the git
gcc-verify command.
I re-setup and can use git gcc-verify. Now I can see it rejects because I
forgot to add a
description of modified file. Now that it passes gcc-verify and I attach the
>>You may need to run contrib/gcc-git-customization.sh to get the git
>>gcc-verify command.
I re-setup and can use git gcc-verify. Now I can see it rejects because I
forgot to add a
description of modified file. Now that it passes gcc-verify and I attach the
changelog
as attachment.
Thank
On 9/26/21 21:31, nick huang via Gcc-patches wrote:
Hi Jason,
1. Thank you very much for your detailed comments for my patch and I really
appreciate it! Here is my revised patch:
The root cause of this bug is that it considers reference with
cv-qualifiers as an error by generating value for
Hi Jason,
1. Thank you very much for your detailed comments for my patch and I really
appreciate it! Here is my revised patch:
The root cause of this bug is that it considers reference with
cv-qualifiers as an error by generating value for variable "bad_quals".
However, this is not correct for
On 8/28/21 07:54, nick huang via Gcc-patches wrote:
Reference with cv-qualifiers should be ignored instead of causing an error
because standard accepts cv-qualified references introduced by typedef which
is ignored.
Therefore, the fix prevents GCC from reporting error by not setting variable
Reference with cv-qualifiers should be ignored instead of causing an error
because standard accepts cv-qualified references introduced by typedef which
is ignored.
Therefore, the fix prevents GCC from reporting error by not setting variable
"bad_quals" in case the reference is introduced by
Reference with cv-qualifiers should be ignored instead of causing an error
because standard accepts cv-qualified references introduced by typedef which
is ignored.
Therefore, the fix prevents GCC from reporting error by not setting variable
"bad_quals" in case the reference is introduced by
11 matches
Mail list logo
