Re: [gdal-dev] GDAL/OGR 1.7.3 Release Candidate

2010-11-07 Thread Even Rouault
Frank, swig/include/perl/gdal_perl.i and swig/python/setup.py still contains reference to 1.7.2 version. The former preventing the Perl bindings from building due to the mismatch (and in gdal-1.7.2.tar.gz, the perl bindings were regenerated) About r21079, I'm curious of the circumstances that

Re: [gdal-dev] GDAL/OGR 1.7.3 Release Candidate

2010-11-07 Thread Frank Warmerdam
Even Rouault wrote: Frank, swig/include/perl/gdal_perl.i and swig/python/setup.py still contains reference to 1.7.2 version. The former preventing the Perl bindings from building due to the mismatch (and in gdal-1.7.2.tar.gz, the perl bindings were regenerated) Even, I have produced an RC2

[gdal-dev] gdal_extents utility?

2010-11-07 Thread Angelos Tzotsos
Hi everyone, I have written a small utility based on gdal recently that extracts the bounding box of any supported spatial data file. http://gimed.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/gimed/trunk/utils/geo_extents.c?revision=14&view=markup This utility is very useful for creating metadata geographic ext

Re: [gdal-dev] gdal_extents utility?

2010-11-07 Thread Even Rouault
Angelos, Speaking for myself : Your utility is certainly usefull for your purposes, but I'm not sure if there is enough "added value" and/or general purposeness to include it as a new utility. Is the output of the utility aimed at some other utilities of a larger processing chain ? Some things

Re: [gdal-dev] gdal_extents utility?

2010-11-07 Thread Angelos Tzotsos
Hi Even, Thank you for your comments. At this point the code serves the purposes of the gimed metadata editor. Of course the utility is going to be re-written if it is to be included in gdal (with different license). All your suggestions are very welcome and will be taken under consideration.