Greetings
I'm using a bash script to reproject an image, using gdalwarp, to a set
of Coordinates/Projection systems. I'm using -tr flag to define output
spatial resolution. Since, i'm using UTM WGS84 I have this information
in Meters (e.g. 30) so far, so good.
The thing is that i need to
Hello,
I need to interrupt a RasterIO and warp calls before they have
been ended.
The call is invoked in a background thread and It may happen that the user
changes the requested area in the main thread (GUI) (eg. a pan/scroll
operation).
Any suggestion,
Stefano
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 01:51:08PM +0100, strk wrote:
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 01:24:08PM +0100, Even Rouault wrote:
So we should implement detection of cycles to emit as
many rings as necessary.
Yes. This for each face.
To add some more about the topic, I'm not sure the directedEdge
strk,
You are right. The sequence of the elements _can_ be specified explicitly
using a sequence tag. Without that it will just be a guess work, especially
if any of the rings have a common point.
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 3:38 PM, strk s...@keybit.net wrote:
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 01:51:08PM
On 11-01-29 03:44 PM, Frank Warmerdam wrote:
To that end, I have prepared an RFC which attempts to address this at
the GDAL driver registration level. I'd appreciate feedback:
http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc34_license_policy
Kudos for coming up with what sounds like a viable solution
On 11-01-29 03:44 PM, Frank Warmerdam wrote:
To that end, I have prepared an RFC which attempts to address this at
the GDAL driver registration level. I'd appreciate feedback:
http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc34_license_policy
I'm asymptotically approaching -1 on this RFC. My concern is
Frank,
I've reviewed the document and it looks good to me, though it seems better
to enforce these constraints rather at deployment time and not at run-time.
However I would have some further questions:
1. With regards to GDAL_APPLICATION_LICENSE_POLICY=DEFAULT does this mean
that GDAL will
On 11-01-31 04:26 AM, Stefano Moratto wrote:
Hello,
I need to interrupt a RasterIO and warp calls before they have been
ended.
The call is invoked in a background thread and It may happen that the user
changes the requested area in the main thread (GUI) (eg. a pan/scroll
On 11-01-31 11:30 AM, Tamas Szekeres wrote:
Frank,
I've reviewed the document and it looks good to me, though it seems better to
enforce these constraints rather at deployment time and not at run-time.
However I would have some further questions:
1. With regards to
On 11-01-31 10:45 AM, Howard Butler wrote:
http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc34_license_policy
I'm asymptotically approaching -1 on this RFC. My concern is that it
misplaces the apparent responsibility for managing licensing constraints on
*us*. It should always be the responsibility of
I think Mr. Butler makes a good point.
Maybe just have folders in the source tree called frmts/reciprocal and
frmts/proprietary and the same for any libs. That way it's in people's
face all the time and impossible not to be conscious of what is licenced
how. And easy to exclude such drivers,
Hello,
I'm running into some problems warping to gnomonic projection. I'm trying to
warp a TIFF in azimuthal-equidistant projection (covering North America,
including the north pole and centered on 46°N, 95°W) to gnomonic. These are the
relevant details and coverage of the input TIFF:
On 11-01-31 12:28 PM, Ray Gardener wrote:
I think Mr. Butler makes a good point.
Maybe just have folders in the source tree called frmts/reciprocal and
frmts/proprietary and the same for any libs. That way it's in people's face
all the time and impossible not to be conscious of what is licenced
On 1/31/2011 12:32 PM, Frank Warmerdam wrote:
That would be adequate for those who are building things from source
and wanting to distribute the resulting binaries under a single
consistent licensing policy. However it does not help me for the
OSGeo4W need.
OSGeo4W is a unified installer...
Thanks for all the suggestions. The following website:
http://sites.google.com/site/bpederse/caliwms gave me an idea of how to
treat the JPEG artifacts.
Going back to our previous discussion, the OpenJPEG implementation of
JPEG2000 creates very clean (at the boundary of data/nodata) compressed
then you can
honestly claim that any violation happened beyond your control
...except that Frank is the principle organizer/maintainer behind
OSGeo4W as well as GDAL.
Not that this necessarily contravenes your main point, that since the
gray area is in o4w and not gdal that's where the
Hello list
I am trying to create a .VRT file to mosaic a bunch of HDF5 files. It
is starting to work, except for the fact that I can't seem to set the
relativeToVRT attribute of the SourceFilename tag to 0.
I've been adapting the online vrt tutorial[1] from C++ to Python. The
tutorial says that
I should ask, is it okay for commercial apps to include GPL'd drivers
currently? What would happen if my app included one? Do I have to wait
for it to be under LGPL?
I don't mind at all sharing any changes I may make to such drivers, but
if I can't even include the drivers, that seems
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 08:59:25PM -0800, Ray Gardener wrote:
I should ask, is it okay for commercial apps to include GPL'd drivers
currently? What would happen if my app included one? Do I have to wait
for it to be under LGPL?
I don't mind at all sharing any changes I may make to such
19 matches
Mail list logo
