[gdal-dev] GDAL Native Libraries 1.4.5b for Linux64 not available

2011-04-13 Thread Andreas Oxenstierna
Need to include GDAL support for GeoServer 2.1 on Linux 64-bit. However, it seems that the link to the native libraries onhttp://java.net/projects/imageio-ext/downloads/directory/Releases/Dependencies/GDAL/NativeLibraries/1.4.5/Linux64/gdal1.4.5b-linux64-base.tar.gz is broken. Can I get the

Re: [gdal-dev] GDAL Native Libraries 1.4.5b for Linux64 not available

2011-04-13 Thread Chaitanya kumar CH
Andreas, The file exists. However, the GDAL 1.4 branch is no longer supported. The latest stable version is 1.8 although 1.7 is also supported. Why don't you use the 1.7 version. http://java.net/projects/imageio-ext/downloads/directory/Releases/Dependencies/GDAL/NativeLibraries/ On Wed, Apr 13,

Re: [gdal-dev] GDAL Native Libraries 1.4.5b for Linux64 not available

2011-04-13 Thread Chaitanya kumar CH
The site also shows the GDAL 1.7.3 version in the dependencies and the file exists. Perhaps imageio-ext 1.0.8 does support gdal1.7.3 On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Andreas Oxenstierna a...@t-kartor.se wrote: If I am interpreting the information correctly on

Re: [gdal-dev] GDAL Native Libraries 1.4.5b for Linux64 not available

2011-04-13 Thread Daniele Romagnoli
Hi all, the ImageIO-Ext 1.0.8 uses GDAL 1.4.5. GDAL 1.7.3 is needed by ImageIO-Ext 1.1.x (which is not yet used by GeoServer 2.2.x... I'm still working on this, these days) About the broken link, I think there is some issue on the new site based on Kenai. Not sure why/how it has been broken since

Re: [gdal-dev] GDAL Native Libraries 1.4.5b for Linux64 not available

2011-04-13 Thread Andreas Oxenstierna
File downloaded, thanks a lot Andreas Hi all, the ImageIO-Ext 1.0.8 uses GDAL 1.4.5. GDAL 1.7.3 is needed by ImageIO-Ext 1.1.x (which is not yet used by GeoServer 2.2.x... I'm still working on this, these days) About the broken link, I think there is some issue on the new site based on

Re: [gdal-dev] gdal datum shift

2011-04-13 Thread Frank Warmerdam
On 11-04-12 06:07 PM, Brian Wilson wrote: Trying to get a raster to go from NAD83 to NAD27 with gdalwarp. Can't see any way to tell how it is choosing to do it. Is this documented anywhere? Is there any way to make it verbose so I can tell if it's trying? I ran it through strace and watched it

Re: [gdal-dev] Re: FileGDB OGR driver test

2011-04-13 Thread Ragi Burhum
Perfect. Thank you Michael. - Ragi Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 15:45:25 -0400 From: Smith, Michael ERDC-CRREL-NH michael.sm...@usace.army.mil Subject: Re: [gdal-dev] Re: FileGDB OGR driver test To: Even Rouault even.roua...@mines-paris.org, gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org Message-ID:

Re: [gdal-dev] Re: FileGDB OGR driver test

2011-04-13 Thread Eli Adam
Ragi, I tested the driver on just one FileGDB which included a date field. You stated, Known issues with build / FileGDB driver - (driver issue) blobs and date fields are not handled at all Here is what I did and successfully got the data. The date field was made a double and populated

Re: [gdal-dev] Re: FileGDB OGR driver test

2011-04-13 Thread Even Rouault
Le mercredi 13 avril 2011 21:00:42, Eli Adam a écrit : Ragi, I tested the driver on just one FileGDB which included a date field. You stated, Known issues with build / FileGDB driver - (driver issue) blobs and date fields are not handled at all Yesterday, with the Michael Smith's

[gdal-dev] Cleaning up the tilefilename generation in gdal2tiles.py

2011-04-13 Thread Martin Krüger
Hello I was in need to generate tiles from a geotiff to publish the image as a tms-service. So i was happy to find the gdal2tiles.py script which does the job. The only issue i stumbled over: gdal2tiles.py generates the tiles in the google format(0,0=top-left) , i need the tms

Re: [gdal-dev] gdal datum shift

2011-04-13 Thread Brian Wilson
Thanks Frank I had guessed that I might have to use -s_srs but doing I saw no tangible results hence my request for more verbose output. --debug on was very useful as was PROJ_DEBUG. As you surmised, the datum NAD83_High_Accuracy_Regional_Network is not recognized as +datum=NAD83 Then I found