Roberto Ribeiro wrote
> How would I go about having multiple GDAL installs in a Windows
> environment? Specifically regarding setting the system variables GDAL_DATA
> and GDAL_DRIVER_PATH.
>
> Even if I append the value with "gdal_1_path;gdal_2_path;gdal_3_path"
> etc.,
> only the first one is
How would I go about having multiple GDAL installs in a Windows
environment? Specifically regarding setting the system variables GDAL_DATA
and GDAL_DRIVER_PATH.
Even if I append the value with "gdal_1_path;gdal_2_path;gdal_3_path" etc.,
only the first one is recognized.
Ok thanks.
On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 8:00 AM, Even Rouault
wrote:
> >
>
> > Great news. Is it possible to provide a user defined list of resolutions
>
> > for the custom scheme which are not power of two?
>
>
>
> Not implemented, but could potentially be done
>
>
>
>
>
> Great news. Is it possible to provide a user defined list of
resolutions
> for the custom scheme which are not power of two?
Not implemented, but could potentially be done
Even
--
Spatialys - Geospatial professional services
http://www.spatialys.com
>
>
>
>
> OK, I've added a TILING_SCHEME dataset creation option to define such as
> custom tiling scheme. See
>
> https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/changeset/41470#file1
>
> for how to use it and how it impacts metadata.json
>
>
>
> Note that this is only implement for file tilesets and not for MBTILES
On mardi 13 février 2018 17:45:18 CET Christoph Paulik wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In my original email I had a small (300KB) test geotiff attached but
> this was rejected by the mailing list. So here the original email again:
>
> If we warp or translate the a GeoTIFF using the Python API
> in the attached
Hi,
In my original email I had a small (300KB) test geotiff attached but
this was rejected by the mailing list. So here the original email again:
If we warp or translate the a GeoTIFF using the Python API
in the attached python file then the output pixel precision is
truncated (even when 15
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> At the moment we create MVT tiles from PostGIS with ST_AsMVT to suit with
> >> the national gridset that is based on ETRS-TM35FIN (EPSG:3067) coordinate
> >> system. How difficult would you consider to enhance the driver to split
> >> and
> >> write vector tiles according to
Even Rouault wrote:
>On mardi 13 février 2018 02:06:47 CET jratike80 wrote:
>> Even Rouault-2 wrote
>>
>> > On lundi 22 janvier 2018 23:40:55 CET Even Rouault wrote:
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> > P.S. @Even: Any news on a GDAL/OGR MVT reader?
>> >>
>> >> Yes, a new OGR MVT reader has just been
Hi all
No there's no standard about non-Webmercator usage of vector tiles.
TileJSON spec. leaves open how CRS is handled which was a wise decision.
So it's up to us to come up with a proposal.
But what's bad is, that TileJSON is not even up-to-date to describe
vector tiles. At least MBTiles
On mardi 13 février 2018 02:06:47 CET jratike80 wrote:
> Even Rouault-2 wrote
>
> > On lundi 22 janvier 2018 23:40:55 CET Even Rouault wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> > P.S. @Even: Any news on a GDAL/OGR MVT reader?
> >>
> >> Yes, a new OGR MVT reader has just been committed in GDAL trunk:
> >>
Even Rouault-2 wrote
> On lundi 22 janvier 2018 23:40:55 CET Even Rouault wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> > P.S. @Even: Any news on a GDAL/OGR MVT reader?
>>
>> Yes, a new OGR MVT reader has just been committed in GDAL trunk:
>> http://gdal.org/drv_mvt.html
>
> And the writer part (for MVT and MBTILES)
12 matches
Mail list logo