On 04/10/2017 07:22 PM, jratike80 wrote:
> Peter Baumann wrote
>> Hi all,
>>
>> why not simply check against the compliance tests of WCS 2 and maybe a
>> reference
>> implementation? Might be the easiest for answering all such questions.
>>
>> cheers,
>>
>> Peter
> Hi,
>
> I could not find exact
Hi Jukka,
On 10 April 2017 at 16:56, wrote:
> Andrea wrote:
>
> If there is no 1:1 correspondence between geographic and raster space
> axis, then I see no other way but to use Function to explicitly correlate
> the two.
> How would you propose to proceed
Peter Baumann wrote
> Hi all,
>
> why not simply check against the compliance tests of WCS 2 and maybe a
> reference
> implementation? Might be the easiest for answering all such questions.
>
> cheers,
>
> Peter
Hi,
I could not find exact match for raster image (GeoTIFF) case from
Hi all,
why not simply check against the compliance tests of WCS 2 and maybe a reference
implementation? Might be the easiest for answering all such questions.
cheers,
Peter
On 04/10/2017 04:23 PM, Even Rouault wrote:
>
> On lundi 10 avril 2017 15:57:03 CEST Andrea Aime wrote:
>
> > Hi Even,
-dev@lists.osgeo.org' (gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org)
<gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org>; Peter Baumann <p.baum...@jacobs-university.de>
Aihe: Re: [Geoserver-devel] [gdal-dev] GML lat-lon coverages and
interoperability
Hi Even,
in CIS 1.1 they state:
Coverages are assumed to have a 1:1 correlation b
On lundi 10 avril 2017 15:57:03 CEST Andrea Aime wrote:
> Hi Even,
> in CIS 1.1 they state:
>
> Coverages are assumed to have a 1:1 correlation between the axis names
> given in axis-Labels and gridLabels, i.e.: they shall relate pairwise,
> given by their sequence position. For example,
Hi Even,
in CIS 1.1 they state:
Coverages are assumed to have a 1:1 correlation between the axis names
given in axis-Labels and gridLabels, i.e.: they shall relate pairwise,
given by their sequence position. For example, axisLabels=“Lat Long h date”
and gridLabels={i j k l} implies a
On lundi 10 avril 2017 15:06:55 CEST Andrea Aime wrote:
> Hi,
> sorry I lost track of the subject. So, to close up, and approach where the
> envelope is reported as "lat lon" and the "i j" raster space
> axis would map pairwise, so i pointing north-wards and j east-wards, would
> be considered