Re: [gdal-dev] [Geoserver-devel] GML lat-lon coverages and interoperability

2017-06-04 Thread Peter Baumann
On 04/10/2017 07:22 PM, jratike80 wrote: > Peter Baumann wrote >> Hi all, >> >> why not simply check against the compliance tests of WCS 2 and maybe a >> reference >> implementation? Might be the easiest for answering all such questions. >> >> cheers, >> >> Peter > Hi, > > I could not find exact

Re: [gdal-dev] [Geoserver-devel] GML lat-lon coverages and interoperability

2017-04-11 Thread Piero Campalani
​Hi Jukka,​ On 10 April 2017 at 16:56, wrote: > Andrea wrote: > > If there is no 1:1 correspondence between geographic and raster space > axis, then I see no other way but to use Function to explicitly correlate > the two. > How would you propose to proceed

Re: [gdal-dev] [Geoserver-devel] GML lat-lon coverages and interoperability

2017-04-10 Thread jratike80
Peter Baumann wrote > Hi all, > > why not simply check against the compliance tests of WCS 2 and maybe a > reference > implementation? Might be the easiest for answering all such questions. > > cheers, > > Peter Hi, I could not find exact match for raster image (GeoTIFF) case from

Re: [gdal-dev] [Geoserver-devel] GML lat-lon coverages and interoperability

2017-04-10 Thread Peter Baumann
Hi all, why not simply check against the compliance tests of WCS 2 and maybe a reference implementation? Might be the easiest for answering all such questions. cheers, Peter On 04/10/2017 04:23 PM, Even Rouault wrote: > > On lundi 10 avril 2017 15:57:03 CEST Andrea Aime wrote: > > > Hi Even,

Re: [gdal-dev] [Geoserver-devel] GML lat-lon coverages and interoperability

2017-04-10 Thread Rahkonen Jukka (MML)
-dev@lists.osgeo.org' (gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org) <gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org>; Peter Baumann <p.baum...@jacobs-university.de> Aihe: Re: [Geoserver-devel] [gdal-dev] GML lat-lon coverages and interoperability Hi Even, in CIS 1.1 they state: Coverages are assumed to have a 1:1 correlation b

Re: [gdal-dev] [Geoserver-devel] GML lat-lon coverages and interoperability

2017-04-10 Thread Even Rouault
On lundi 10 avril 2017 15:57:03 CEST Andrea Aime wrote: > Hi Even, > in CIS 1.1 they state: > > Coverages are assumed to have a 1:1 correlation between the axis names > given in axis-Labels and gridLabels, i.e.: they shall relate pairwise, > given by their sequence position. For example,

Re: [gdal-dev] [Geoserver-devel] GML lat-lon coverages and interoperability

2017-04-10 Thread Andrea Aime
Hi Even, in CIS 1.1 they state: Coverages are assumed to have a 1:1 correlation between the axis names given in axis-Labels and gridLabels, i.e.: they shall relate pairwise, given by their sequence position. For example, axisLabels=“Lat Long h date” and gridLabels={i j k l} implies a

Re: [gdal-dev] [Geoserver-devel] GML lat-lon coverages and interoperability

2017-04-10 Thread Even Rouault
On lundi 10 avril 2017 15:06:55 CEST Andrea Aime wrote: > Hi, > sorry I lost track of the subject. So, to close up, and approach where the > envelope is reported as "lat lon" and the "i j" raster space > axis would map pairwise, so i pointing north-wards and j east-wards, would > be considered