Re: [gdal-dev] 1.8 Release - Need to move!

2010-12-23 Thread Frank Warmerdam
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 7:04 AM, Even Rouault wrote: > Selon Jean-Claude Repetto : > >> Le 22/12/2010 14:57, Even Rouault a écrit : >> >> > I'm not so sure there are many low-hanging fruits. The size of a patch >> isn't >> > necessary a proof of its correctness ;-) Perhaps you could help us and >>

Re: [gdal-dev] 1.8 Release - Need to move!

2010-12-23 Thread Even Rouault
Selon Jean-Claude Repetto : > Le 22/12/2010 14:57, Even Rouault a écrit : > > > I'm not so sure there are many low-hanging fruits. The size of a patch > isn't > > necessary a proof of its correctness ;-) Perhaps you could help us and > indicate > > what tickets you believe to be appropriate for qu

Re: [gdal-dev] 1.8 Release - Need to move!

2010-12-23 Thread Jean-Claude Repetto
Le 22/12/2010 14:57, Even Rouault a écrit : I'm not so sure there are many low-hanging fruits. The size of a patch isn't necessary a proof of its correctness ;-) Perhaps you could help us and indicate what tickets you believe to be appropriate for quick closing/patching ? This is an example,

Re: [gdal-dev] 1.8 Release - Need to move!

2010-12-22 Thread Even Rouault
Selon Jean-Claude Repetto : > Hello, > > At this time, there are 595 active tickets in Trac. Don't you think it > would be useful to organize a "bug hunting day" to close a maximum > number of tickets ? Some of them are just small patches, they could be > closed very quickly. Naturally, this shoul

Re: [gdal-dev] 1.8 Release - Need to move!

2010-12-22 Thread Jean-Claude Repetto
Le 17/12/2010 17:16, Frank Warmerdam a écrit : I've been dragging my feet on release for a couple weeks now because I'm uncertain about the OGR 64 bit RFC. Rather than vacillate into new year, I would like to defer it to 1.9 and start a beta program. Are there any objections to me producing a "b

Re: [gdal-dev] 1.8 Release - Need to move!

2010-12-17 Thread Even Rouault
Le vendredi 17 décembre 2010 17:16:40, Frank Warmerdam a écrit : > Folks, > > I've been dragging my feet on release for a couple weeks now because I'm > uncertain about the OGR 64 bit RFC. Rather than vacillate into new year, I > would like to defer it to 1.9 and start a beta program. Are there

[gdal-dev] 1.8 Release - Need to move!

2010-12-17 Thread Frank Warmerdam
Folks, I've been dragging my feet on release for a couple weeks now because I'm uncertain about the OGR 64 bit RFC. Rather than vacillate into new year, I would like to defer it to 1.9 and start a beta program. Are there any objections to me producing a "beta 1" this weekend? My hope is that