Re: [gdal-dev] GML lat-lon coverages and interoperability

2017-04-10 Thread Andrea Aime
Hi, sorry I lost track of the subject. So, to close up, and approach where the envelope is reported as "lat lon" and the "i j" raster space axis would map pairwise, so i pointing north-wards and j east-wards, would be considered valid? E.g., if one rescaling says "i is going to be 200 pixels" it

Re: [gdal-dev] GML lat-lon coverages and interoperability

2017-04-05 Thread Peter Baumann
On 04/05/2017 02:16 PM, Andrea Aime wrote: > On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 12:24 PM, Peter Baumann > wrote: > > To avoid the problems that other standards have with axis order, coverages > contain the axis order

Re: [gdal-dev] GML lat-lon coverages and interoperability

2017-04-05 Thread Andrea Aime
On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 12:24 PM, Peter Baumann < p.baum...@jacobs-university.de> wrote: > To avoid the problems that other standards have with axis order, coverages > contain the axis order explicitly, in the axisLabels attribute. Here an > example: > >

Re: [gdal-dev] GML lat-lon coverages and interoperability

2017-04-04 Thread Peter Baumann
Hi all, introducing (outing) myself as the coverage standard / WCS editor. To avoid the problems that other standards have with axis order, coverages contain the axis order explicitly, in the axisLabels attribute. Here an example: http://www.opengis.net/def/crs/EPSG/0/4326;

Re: [gdal-dev] GML lat-lon coverages and interoperability

2017-04-04 Thread Rahkonen Jukka (MML)
23:03 Vastaanottaja: gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org Kopio: Rahkonen Jukka (MML); Andrea Aime; geoserver-de...@lists.sourceforge.net Aihe: Re: [gdal-dev] GML lat-lon coverages and interoperability On lundi 3 avril 2017 13:19:18 CEST Rahkonen Jukka (MML) wrote: > Great, first hit from Andrea. I am

Re: [gdal-dev] GML lat-lon coverages and interoperability

2017-04-03 Thread Even Rouault
ettäjä: andrea.a...@gmail.com [mailto:andrea.a...@gmail.com] Puolesta > Andrea Aime Lähetetty: 3. huhtikuuta 2017 15:58 > Vastaanottaja: Rahkonen Jukka (MML) <jukka.rahko...@maanmittauslaitos.fi> > Kopio: 'gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org' (gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org) > <gdal-dev@lists

Re: [gdal-dev] GML lat-lon coverages and interoperability

2017-04-03 Thread Rahkonen Jukka (MML)
61.7282236) ( 24d50'32.16"E, 61d43'41.61"N) -Jukka- Lähettäjä: andrea.a...@gmail.com [mailto:andrea.a...@gmail.com] Puolesta Andrea Aime Lähetetty: 3. huhtikuuta 2017 16:31 Vastaanottaja: Rahkonen Jukka (MML) <jukka.rahko...@maanmittauslaitos.fi> Kopio: 'gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org' (

Re: [gdal-dev] GML lat-lon coverages and interoperability

2017-04-03 Thread Andrea Aime
On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 3:19 PM, Rahkonen Jukka (MML) < jukka.rahko...@maanmittauslaitos.fi> wrote: > > > 61.7282236395245 24.7248340978191 > > 61.7838827490233 24.8422668729657 > Can you clarify which one is longitude and which one is latitude? :-) It's one thing that really

Re: [gdal-dev] GML lat-lon coverages and interoperability

2017-04-03 Thread Rahkonen Jukka (MML)
3. huhtikuuta 2017 15:58 Vastaanottaja: Rahkonen Jukka (MML) <jukka.rahko...@maanmittauslaitos.fi> Kopio: 'gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org' (gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org) <gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org>; geoserver-de...@lists.sourceforge.net Aihe: Re: [gdal-dev] GML lat-lon coverages and interoperabi

Re: [gdal-dev] GML lat-lon coverages and interoperability

2017-04-03 Thread Andrea Aime
On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 2:32 PM, Rahkonen Jukka (MML) < jukka.rahko...@maanmittauslaitos.fi> wrote: > With orthophoto coverages I believe that all cases could be handled with > the default gridFunctions: startPoint at gml:Low, axisOrder +1 +2, sequence > rule “Linear”. As far as I have understood

[gdal-dev] GML lat-lon coverages and interoperability

2017-04-03 Thread Rahkonen Jukka (MML)
Cross posting intentionally. TL;DR I wonder if all projects under the OSGeo umbrella, starting from GDAL and Geoserver, could make a common agreement on not to use GridFunctions in GML coverages if they are not strictly needed. The other alternative would be to make all projects to support