On 28-06-2010 23:47, Michael Sumner wrote:
Thanks for the heads up, I've not used GMT versions of NetCDF much, or
recently. The vast majority of NetCDF I've had to work with do not
make this explicit, and this is about the most detailed discussion
I've seen:
http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-metad.
Thanks for the heads up, I've not used GMT versions of NetCDF much, or
recently. The vast majority of NetCDF I've had to work with do not
make this explicit, and this is about the most detailed discussion
I've seen:
http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-metad...@cgd.ucar.edu/msg00566.html
Cheers, Mike.
On 28-06-2010 23:21, Michael Sumner wrote:
Am I correct in interpreting this post to mean that the pixel-is-area and pixel-is-point tiffs>are
read the exact same way by GDAL, with the only difference being in the value of the>AREA_OR_POINT
metadata key? Should viewers then be looking for>the "A
> Am I correct in interpreting this post to mean that the pixel-is-area and
> pixel-is-point tiffs >are read the exact same way by GDAL, with the only
> difference being in the value of the >AREA_OR_POINT metadata key? Should
> viewers then be looking for >the "AREA_OR_POINT" key in addition to
Hi,
I'm trying to wrap my head around Geotiff's AREA_OR_POINT=Area versus
AREA_OR_POINT=Point, and how that translates into GDAL. I've read the
"PixelIsPoint Raster Space" and "PixelIsArea Raster Space" sections of the
geotiff spec, and tried to find previous posts on the topic with very limi
