nmittauslaitos.fi>
Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2016 9:18:43 AM
To: Even Rouault; Ivan Lucena
Cc: gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
Subject: Re: [gdal-dev] Ogr2ogr -dim and Oracle
Hi,
Probably SDO_COORD_REF_SYS is what to use nowadays even I guess that it points
to MDSYS tables. Looks like somethin
Hi,
Probably SDO_COORD_REF_SYS is what to use nowadays even I guess that it points
to MDSYS tables. Looks like something has changed with Oracle 10.2 and I
believe that it is very hard to use so old Oracle version without paying much
extra.
Le jeudi 17 novembre 2016 14:19:10, Ivan Lucena a écrit :
> Hi Even,
>
> Did you try your change?
Yes
>
> There has been a lot of changes in both sides over the years that are not
> reflected on the OCI driver code.
>
> That hard coded SRID conversion should be deleted since EPSG is fully
>
Hi Even,
Did you try your change?
There has been a lot of changes in both sides over the years that are not
reflected on the OCI driver code.
That hard coded SRID conversion should be deleted since EPSG is fully supported
now.
He georaster driver uses some PLSQL functions to try to match WKT
Le jeudi 17 novembre 2016 12:49:09, Michael Smith a écrit :
> Yes even the current version needs the layer creation option for dim. I
> would be +1 for this change (never really understood why it was this way).
> I think we are probably one of the biggest users of the oracle driver and
> I think
i>
> Kopio: 'gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org' (gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org)
> <gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org>
> Aihe: Re: [gdal-dev] Ogr2ogr -dim and Oracle
>
> Yes even the current version needs the layer creation option for dim. I would
> be +1 for this change (never really understoo
hko...@maanmittauslaitos.fi>
Kopio: 'gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org' (gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org)
<gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org>
Aihe: Re: [gdal-dev] Ogr2ogr -dim and Oracle
Yes even the current version needs the layer creation option for dim. I would
be +1 for this change (never really understood why it was
Yes even the current version needs the layer creation option for dim. I would
be +1 for this change (never really understood why it was this way). I think we
are probably one of the biggest users of the oracle driver and I think this
would be a good improvement.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Nov
On jeudi 17 novembre 2016 08:06:24 CET Rahkonen Jukka (MML) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I noticed that Even was editing the ogr2ogr help about the -dim parameter
> and remembered that I think that it does not have an effect on the OCI
> driver. For forcing a new Oracle table into 2D you must use the OCI
Hi,
I noticed that Even was editing the ogr2ogr help about the -dim parameter and
remembered that I think that it does not have an effect on the OCI driver. For
forcing a new Oracle table into 2D you must use the OCI drivers own layer
creation option "DIM" instead
10 matches
Mail list logo
