Since this one affected me, I would like to ask if the fix for
http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/ticket/3411 is included?
Regards,
Peter
R3 GIS Srl - GmbH
http://www.r3-gis.com
Frank Warmerdam warmer...@pobox.com wrote
Subject: [gdal-dev] GDAL/OGR 1.7.3 Release Candidate
Date:
Peter Hopfgartner wrote:
Since this one affected me, I would like to ask if the fix for
http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/ticket/3411 is included?
Peter,
The comments in the ticket seem to indicate the fix was only in trunk,
not the 1.7 stable branch. My review of changes in the branch used to
On 11/6/10 7:48 PM, Frank Warmerdam wrote:
I have a GDAL/OGR 1.7.3 release candidate available at last. I had to hold
off last week as the autotests were failing in hard to track down ways.
http://download.osgeo.org/gdal/gdal-1.7.3RC1.tar.gz
http://download.osgeo.org/gdal/gdal173RC1.zip
Frank,
swig/include/perl/gdal_perl.i and swig/python/setup.py still contains
reference to 1.7.2 version. The former preventing the Perl bindings from
building due to the mismatch (and in gdal-1.7.2.tar.gz, the perl bindings were
regenerated)
About r21079, I'm curious of the circumstances that
Even Rouault wrote:
Frank,
swig/include/perl/gdal_perl.i and swig/python/setup.py still contains
reference to 1.7.2 version. The former preventing the Perl bindings from
building due to the mismatch (and in gdal-1.7.2.tar.gz, the perl bindings were
regenerated)
Even,
I have produced an
