On 10 June 2010 16:23, Chow Loong Jin wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 11:16:53 +1000
> Lex Trotman wrote:
>
>> Hi Chow,
>>
>> remembering that I'm AC_illiterate :) the problem seems to be that
>> plugins configure where they install based on where geany's pkg-config
>> says, ignoring what the --pref
On 10 June 2010 16:53, Chow Loong Jin wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 10:54:46 +1000
> Lex Trotman wrote:
>
>> >> Sigh, this isn't your fault, but I have problems with installing
>> >> unknown software to system directories and plugins autofools is broken
>> >> WRT installing to a non-standard prefi
On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 17:41:13 +1000
Lex Trotman wrote:
> On 10 June 2010 16:23, Chow Loong Jin wrote:
> > On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 11:16:53 +1000
> > Lex Trotman wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Chow,
> >>
> >> remembering that I'm AC_illiterate :) the problem seems to be that
> >> plugins configure where they ins
On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 17:46:37 +1000
Lex Trotman wrote:
> Yes, I'd encourage Jiri to do that when his plugin is mature enough,
> even he notes problems that won't be fixed by the plugins release for
> 0.19.
Yes of course, nothing new should enter geany-plugins until 0.19 gets released,
since it's
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 02:00, Lex Trotman wrote:
> On 10 June 2010 02:57, Chow Loong Jin wrote:
>> On Wed, 09 Jun 2010 18:15:02 +0200
>> Thomas Martitz wrote:
>>
>>> Am 09.06.2010 18:09, schrieb Nick Treleaven:
>>> > On Wed, 09 Jun 2010 15:11:48 +0200
>>> > Thomas Martitz wrote:
>>> >
>>> >
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 03:07, Lex Trotman wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Note to self, read the whole thread before replying to any :-) see my
> other reply plus below.
>
>
>>> Yes I realised a while ago it can be confusing, thats part of why I
>>> want to combine both dialogs into one in v2.0.
>>>
>>
>> Yes,
On 10 June 2010 19:44, Jiří Techet wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 03:07, Lex Trotman wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Note to self, read the whole thread before replying to any :-) see my
>> other reply plus below.
>>
>>
Yes I realised a while ago it can be confusing, thats part of why I
want to c
On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 11:44:24 +0200
Jiří Techet wrote:
> > And you program in C++ !! I'd have thought overriding some entries
> > only would be easy to understand :-)
>
> Yes, but I didn't say I like C++ - I don't. The language is made in a
> completely wrong way. Unfortunately the fact is that i
On Wed, 9 Jun 2010 21:40:58 +0200
Jiří Techet wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Jiří Techet
> ---
> src/plugindata.h |2 ++
> + gint plugin_version_check(gint abi_ver);\
> gint plugin_version_check(gint abi_ver) \
> { \
Why is this necessary?
Regards,
Nick
_
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 12:35, Lex Trotman wrote:
> On 10 June 2010 19:44, Jiří Techet wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 03:07, Lex Trotman wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Note to self, read the whole thread before replying to any :-) see my
>>> other reply plus below.
>>>
>>>
> Yes I realised a whil
On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 11:44:24 +0200
Jiří Techet wrote:
> >> Yes, it's pretty confusing. Once you create a project you don't expect
> >> that what you see in the build tab changes based on what change you
> >> make in the global settings (until you modify the commands in the
> >> project for the fi
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 13:05, Nick Treleaven
wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Jun 2010 21:40:58 +0200
> Jiří Techet wrote:
>
>> Signed-off-by: Jiří Techet
>> ---
>> src/plugindata.h | 2 ++
>
>> + gint plugin_version_check(gint abi_ver);\
>> gint plugin_version_check(gint abi_ver) \
>> {
On Wed, 9 Jun 2010 21:40:57 +0200
Jiří Techet wrote:
> There is a 600ms interval in which the panel displaying the current file
> name isn't displayed. If you switch tabs with a keybinding and do it
> too quickly (press it twice in the 600ms period), the wrong file is
> put on top of the stack.
On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 13:33:44 +0200
Jiří Techet wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 13:05, Nick Treleaven
> wrote:
> > On Wed, 9 Jun 2010 21:40:58 +0200
> > Jiří Techet wrote:
> >
> >> Signed-off-by: Jiří Techet
> >> ---
> >> src/plugindata.h | 2 ++
> >
> >> + gint plugin_version_check(gi
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 13:40, Nick Treleaven
wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Jun 2010 21:40:57 +0200
> Jiří Techet wrote:
>
>> There is a 600ms interval in which the panel displaying the current file
>> name isn't displayed. If you switch tabs with a keybinding and do it
>> too quickly (press it twice in th
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 13:49, Nick Treleaven
wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 13:33:44 +0200
> Jiří Techet wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 13:05, Nick Treleaven
>> wrote:
>> > On Wed, 9 Jun 2010 21:40:58 +0200
>> > Jiří Techet wrote:
>> >
>> >> Signed-off-by: Jiří Techet
>> >> ---
>> >> src
On 10 June 2010 21:23, Nick Treleaven wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 11:44:24 +0200
> Jiří Techet wrote:
>
>> >> Yes, it's pretty confusing. Once you create a project you don't expect
>> >> that what you see in the build tab changes based on what change you
>> >> make in the global settings (until
> I would have to check what exactly -W and -ansi consist of but I think
> they don't contain -Wmissing-prototypes.
>
Thats right they don't. There was a big argument on another project
site, -Wmissing-prototypes isn't automatic since the problem it
detects is completely legal, but as you point
On 10 June 2010 21:03, Nick Treleaven wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 11:44:24 +0200
> Jiří Techet wrote:
>
>> > And you program in C++ !! I'd have thought overriding some entries
>> > only would be easy to understand :-)
>>
>> Yes, but I didn't say I like C++ - I don't. The language is made in a
>>
On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 23:23:21 +1000
Lex Trotman wrote:
> > Go is not a good replacement for C++, try D. Some people say Go is a
> > good replacement for C.
>
> And some people say that it has sadly made some decisions that prevent
> it being that, but with Google behind it it may succeed anyway,
On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 14:21:27 +0200
Jiří Techet wrote:
> Imagine you have:
>
> foo.h:
> void foo(void);
>
> foo.c:
> #include "foo.h"
>
> void foo(void)
> {
> printf("foo");
> }
>
> main.c:
> #include "foo.h"
>
> int main(int argc, char **argv)
> {
> foo();
> return 0;
> }
>
> This is
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 15:23, Lex Trotman wrote:
> On 10 June 2010 21:03, Nick Treleaven wrote:
>> On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 11:44:24 +0200
>> Jiří Techet wrote:
>>
>>> > And you program in C++ !! I'd have thought overriding some entries
>>> > only would be easy to understand :-)
>>>
>>> Yes, but I d
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 14:59, Lex Trotman wrote:
> On 10 June 2010 21:23, Nick Treleaven wrote:
>> On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 11:44:24 +0200
>> Jiří Techet wrote:
>>
>>> >> Yes, it's pretty confusing. Once you create a project you don't expect
>>> >> that what you see in the build tab changes based on
On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 16:28:42 +0200
Jiří Techet wrote:
> >> Go is not a good replacement for C++, try D. Some people say Go is a
> >> good replacement for C.
> >
> > And some people say that it has sadly made some decisions that prevent
> > it being that, but with Google behind it it may succeed a
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 08:23, Chow Loong Jin wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 11:16:53 +1000
> Lex Trotman wrote:
>
>> Hi Chow,
>>
>> remembering that I'm AC_illiterate :) the problem seems to be that
>> plugins configure where they install based on where geany's pkg-config
>> says, ignoring what th
On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 22:59:11 +1000
Lex Trotman wrote:
> >> >> What I would suggest is that upon project creation you make a complete
> >> >> copy
> >> >
> >> > Thats just what I didn't want to do, remember there are filetype
> >> > commands and execute commands too makes each project copy big.
>
On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 17:24:39 +0200
Jiří Techet wrote:
> 1. the GeanyProject structure should be private for the project
> implementation and contain those things that are relevant to the
> session-project (I have similar private structure for my project)
> 2. app->project should contain a structu
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 17:25, Nick Treleaven
wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 16:28:42 +0200
> Jiří Techet wrote:
>
>> >> Go is not a good replacement for C++, try D. Some people say Go is a
>> >> good replacement for C.
>> >
>> > And some people say that it has sadly made some decisions that preven
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 17:39, Nick Treleaven
wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 17:24:39 +0200
> Jiří Techet wrote:
>
>> 1. the GeanyProject structure should be private for the project
>> implementation and contain those things that are relevant to the
>> session-project (I have similar private struct
On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 17:48:39 +0200
Jiří Techet wrote:
> > I agree it helps, but are there really no successful widespread
> > languages that didn't have corporate backing?
> >
>
> Unfortunately we're not living in the 70's or 80's, where the best had
> a chance, and there's a lot of software wri
On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 18:10:57 +0200
Jiří Techet wrote:
> > Otherwise it's a mess e.g. with project indentation settings.
>
> Glad you said it first, I feel I have been too negative in the past
I didn't mean Geany's implementation is a mess, I meant if a plugin
overrode the project support it wou
On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 17:29:26 +0200
Jiří Techet wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 08:23, Chow Loong Jin
> wrote:
> > On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 11:16:53 +1000
> > Lex Trotman wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Chow,
> >>
> >> remembering that I'm AC_illiterate :) the problem seems to be that
> >> plugins configure wher
Hi,
On Wed, 9 Jun 2010 21:40:59 +0200
Jiří Techet wrote:
> Add .gitignore to eliminate the files we do not want to see in git
I don't see any need to add an .gitignore to the subversion repository
and suggest to have this only locally.
Cheers,
Frank
--
http://frank.uvena.de/en/
pgpp3la
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 18:20, Nick Treleaven
wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 18:10:57 +0200
> Jiří Techet wrote:
>
>> > Otherwise it's a mess e.g. with project indentation settings.
>>
>> Glad you said it first, I feel I have been too negative in the past
>
> I didn't mean Geany's implementation is
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 18:36, Frank Lanitz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 9 Jun 2010 21:40:59 +0200
> Jiří Techet wrote:
>
>> Add .gitignore to eliminate the files we do not want to see in git
>
> I don't see any need to add an .gitignore to the subversion repository
> and suggest to have this only l
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 18:21, Chow Loong Jin wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 17:29:26 +0200
> Jiří Techet wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 08:23, Chow Loong Jin
>> wrote:
>> > On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 11:16:53 +1000
>> > Lex Trotman wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hi Chow,
>> >>
>> >> remembering that I'm AC_ill
On Tue, 8 Jun 2010 22:19:37 +0200
Jiří Techet wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 19:03, Dimitar Zhekov wrote:
> >
> > Depends what you call of a project. How about "the files in a certain
> > directory and it's subdirectories"? All open source software is
>
> Precisely! That's _exactly_ what my pl
On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 20:54:34 +0300
Dimitar Zhekov wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Jun 2010 22:19:37 +0200
> Jiří Techet wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 19:03, Dimitar Zhekov
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Depends what you call of a project. How about "the files in a
> > > certain directory and it's subdirector
On 06/10/2010 09:59 AM, Jiří Techet wrote:
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 18:36, Frank Lanitz wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, 9 Jun 2010 21:40:59 +0200
Jiří Techet wrote:
Add .gitignore to eliminate the files we do not want to see in git
I don't see any need to add an .gitignore to the subversion repository
>
> I'm just afraid of "lost in dialogs, lost in overrides, not knowing
> what settings is currently applied hell" I know from other IDEs.
> Should be made carefully.
Very true, I too have used Eclipse...
Trouble is each setting makes sense as a project specific setting in
some use cases, so ho
On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 22:31:27 +0200
Jiří Techet wrote:
> I'd be happy if you tested it - you'd be the first one ;-).
I tested your plugin and I really liked it, nice job.
My geanyprj plugin idea about all project files located at the one basedir made
bad joke of me.
Lately I have to work with l
Am 10.06.2010 18:36, schrieb Frank Lanitz:
Hi,
On Wed, 9 Jun 2010 21:40:59 +0200
Jiří Techet wrote:
Add .gitignore to eliminate the files we do not want to see in git
I don't see any need to add an .gitignore to the subversion repository
and suggest to have this only locally.
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 19:54, Dimitar Zhekov wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Jun 2010 22:19:37 +0200
> Jiří Techet wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 19:03, Dimitar Zhekov
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Depends what you call of a project. How about "the files in a certain
>> > directory and it's subdirectories"? All
On 11 June 2010 01:36, Nick Treleaven wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 22:59:11 +1000
> Lex Trotman wrote:
>
>> >> >> What I would suggest is that upon project creation you make a complete
>> >> >> copy
>> >> >
>> >> > Thats just what I didn't want to do, remember there are filetype
>> >> > commands
On 11 June 2010 01:24, Jiří Techet wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 14:59, Lex Trotman wrote:
>> On 10 June 2010 21:23, Nick Treleaven wrote:
>>> On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 11:44:24 +0200
>>> Jiří Techet wrote:
>>>
>> Yes, it's pretty confusing. Once you create a project you don't expect
>>
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 23:09, Dimitar Zhekov wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 02:18:39 +0800
> Chow Loong Jin wrote:
>
>>
>> It's git://gitorious.org/gproject/mainline.git.
>
> Thanks.
>
> On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 22:31:27 +0200
> Jiří Techet wrote:
>
>> > Yet another file system browser...
>>
>> ...tha
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 23:07, Yura Siamashka wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 22:31:27 +0200
> Jiří Techet wrote:
>
>> I'd be happy if you tested it - you'd be the first one ;-).
>
> I tested your plugin and I really liked it, nice job.
Thanks for your original plugin - it made me look at the probl
On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 02:18:39 +0800
Chow Loong Jin wrote:
>
> It's git://gitorious.org/gproject/mainline.git.
Thanks.
On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 22:31:27 +0200
Jiří Techet wrote:
> > Yet another file system browser...
>
> ...that is integrated to geany and makes it possible to access files
> fast a
On 11 June 2010 02:20, Nick Treleaven wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 18:10:57 +0200
> Jiří Techet wrote:
>
>> > Otherwise it's a mess e.g. with project indentation settings.
>>
>> Glad you said it first, I feel I have been too negative in the past
>
> I didn't mean Geany's implementation is a mess,
On 11 June 2010 02:15, Nick Treleaven wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 17:48:39 +0200
> Jiří Techet wrote:
>
>> > I agree it helps, but are there really no successful widespread
>> > languages that didn't have corporate backing?
>> >
If success = widespread use then python and php?
>>
>> Unfortunat
On 10 June 2010 23:51, Nick Treleaven wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 14:21:27 +0200
> Jiří Techet wrote:
>
>> Imagine you have:
>>
>> foo.h:
>> void foo(void);
>>
>> foo.c:
>> #include "foo.h"
>>
>> void foo(void)
>> {
>> printf("foo");
>> }
>>
>> main.c:
>> #include "foo.h"
>>
>> int main(int ar
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 00:17, Lex Trotman wrote:
> On 11 June 2010 02:15, Nick Treleaven wrote:
>> On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 17:48:39 +0200
>> Jiří Techet wrote:
>>
>>> > I agree it helps, but are there really no successful widespread
>>> > languages that didn't have corporate backing?
>>> >
>
> If s
On 11 June 2010 09:37, Jiří Techet wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 00:17, Lex Trotman wrote:
>> On 11 June 2010 02:15, Nick Treleaven wrote:
>>> On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 17:48:39 +0200
>>> Jiří Techet wrote:
>>>
> I agree it helps, but are there really no successful widespread
> languages
53 matches
Mail list logo
