On Thu, 10 May 2007 23:38:36 -0400, al davis wrote:
>> At my university
>> day-job the absence of a windows version is a major obstacle to move
>> from eagle to geda.
>
> That's sad. Any university that is exclusively windows is doing a grave
> disservice to the students.
The institution does
On Friday 11 May 2007, DJ Delorie wrote:
> My point is that the gEDA suite does not include *any*
> pre-built binaries. Thus, a lack of a "binary installer" for
> Windows means nothing. The CD does not include Linux
> binaries, but we certainly support Linux. You have to build
> for *all* platfo
> > (1) There is no Solaris binary either, but you claim we should say we
> >support that.
>
> Does that mean, that the gEDA Suite CD will not run on a solaris machine?
My point is that the gEDA suite does not include *any* pre-built
binaries. Thus, a lack of a "binary installer" for Windo
On May 11, 2007, at 12:06 AM, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
(1) There is no Solaris binary either, but you claim we should say we
support that.
Does that mean, that the gEDA Suite CD will not run on a solaris
machine?
I run it under Solaris all the time..
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire
Port C
On Thu, 10 May 2007 23:27:08 -0400, DJ Delorie wrote:
> (1) There is no Solaris binary either, but you claim we should say we
>support that.
Does that mean, that the gEDA Suite CD will not run on a solaris machine?
> (2) PCB *does* include scripts to build under Windows (mingw). Heck,
>
On Thursday 10 May 2007, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
> At my university
> day-job the absence of a windows version is a major obstacle
> to move from eagle to geda.
That's sad. Any university that is exclusively windows is doing
a grave disservice to the students.
> The amount of
> programming/tu
> There is no windows binary to download and no installer to compile from
> source on a windows machine either.
(1) There is no Solaris binary either, but you claim we should say we
support that.
(2) PCB *does* include scripts to build under Windows (mingw). Heck,
there's a toplevel "
On Thu, 10 May 2007 21:18:46 -0400, DJ Delorie wrote:
> Er, gEDA and PCB both run under Windows. It's not easy, but it's
> possible.
There is no windows binary to download and no installer to compile from
source on a windows machine either. To the vast majority of computer
users, including me
Hi,
[snip]
>What do you think about this?
Yeah, it would be nice if the de version was in sync with the en
version.
-Ales
___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
ht
> Yup, gEDA/gaf can be built using mingw (native) as well (and
> of course cygwin). It is just that there are no installers
> available for the mingw port; you have to figure out setting up the
> build environment and do then do the build.
PCB uses an open source windows installer, if you'
[snip]
>PCB uses mingw - no cygwin, no virtual machine. I don't know about
>geda, but there are native gtk ports to Windows, so no reason why it
>wouldn't work that way.
Yup, gEDA/gaf can be built using mingw (native) as well (and of
course cygwin). It is just that there are no installer
> > There is one big difference: In german description reader is told
> > that gEDA is for Windows too, and example picture is taken from
> > running gschem on Windows (or is this a fake?)
>
> This is plain wrong.
Er, gEDA and PCB both run under Windows. It's not easy, but it's
possible.
> >
On Thu, 10 May 2007 19:22:50 +0200, Stefan Salewski wrote:
> There is one big difference: In german description reader is told that
> gEDA is for Windows too, and example picture is taken from running
> gschem on Windows (or is this a fake?)
This is plain wrong.
> I think it should be stated th
I see no reason to not make the changes you describe. Go for it!
I think it should be stated that gEDA is basically a Unix/Linux/GNU
application, but that it may be possible to run it on windows?
This is true, but a windoze build does require some effort. Maybe
mention that certain developer
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geda
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/GEDA
Hello,
I think the description of gEDA in German version of wikipedia is not
very good. Should we replace it with a translation of the englisch one?
There is one big difference: In german description reader is told that
gEDA is
On 5/9/07, somethin2cool <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
For completeness:
The reason nothing works is because the debian geda package doesn't
include all the pieces. It works now. Although I can't figure out how to
export a netlist
You don't export a netlist from gschem. You use gnetlist on the sc
Yes, I do that on my desktop with all the packages, especially pcb. I
couldn't be bothered on my laptop, which I rarely use for real work of
this type. This way I can have 2 different versions going at the same
time and get myself really confused (not hard).
On Tue, 2007-05-08 at 16:44 -0500, Crai
17 matches
Mail list logo
