On Monday 07 January 2008, a r wrote:
Say I have a MOS transistor instance on schematic. When I
open the properties dialog of this instance, I expect to see
a drop-list of available model types/levels, along with a
list of text fields where I can define parameters that are
relevant to the
On Tue, 08 Jan 2008 14:32:47 -0500, al davis wrote:
The symbol
library cannot know about all variants of all symbols, all of the
parameters, etc.
But it could allow me, the user, to tell the system about my preferred
footprints. For example 0805, or 0402, or 20pt thru hole for a resistor.
On Monday 07 January 2008, Peter Clifton wrote:
PS.. I usually use a text editor to make spice netlists, not
because I don't find gschem capable enough.. it just doesn't
always fit my way of working.
I use gschem for the circuit, but that is all. I make
a include file for the models, then run
al davis wrote:
On Monday 07 January 2008, a r wrote:
Say I have a MOS transistor instance on schematic. When I
open the properties dialog of this instance, I expect to see
a drop-list of available model types/levels, along with a
list of text fields where I can define parameters that are
They seem to work now, thanks.
Britton
On Tue, 01 Jan 2008 16:15:50 -0500, Ales Hvezda
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
It seems that the Download links for the README and Install Instructions
files under the gEDA Suite CDROM section of
http://geda.seul.org/download.html
are broken.
When
On Fri, 4 Jan 2008 10:54:13 -0500, Dave McGuire
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Jan 3, 2008, at 9:52 PM, Peter Clifton wrote:
I'm posting this here, attempting to solicit some eedback...
I've just written a patch which revamps PCB's footprint library window.
It borrows code from gschem's
al davis wrote:
As a teacher, I require students to learn how to use netlists
and simulator commands directly. If they want to use a GUI,
that is their choice, provided that it doesn't get in the way,
and they learn how to work without the GUI. I show them the
command line and text
On Jan 8, 2008 5:55 PM, Britton Kerin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Agreed wholeheartedly. The names in for example Luciani's footprints
aren't ttotally clear (to inexperienced me at least).
The majority of the footprints in my library should follow the naming
convention that is documented in
On Jan 7, 2008, at 4:33 PM, a r wrote:
On Jan 7, 2008 10:48 PM, Peter Clifton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2008-01-07 at 22:41 +, a r wrote:
Well, last time I tried gschem it didn't work for me. It had no
hierarchical circuit support, no ready to use components, no
auto-numbered
Hi All,
2 years ago, I have already replaced my (US $15K/seat)
schematic/netlist commercial frontend tools, with gEDA;
for design of hundred million transistors VLSI design. All
becasue gEDA is a very powerful, generic, frontend
tools.
Lots of gEDA built-in generic features are not known to
the
Hi Alan, a copy of my original post has been sent to Ales Hvezda. I guess
he is a busy guy and looking after us and other groups is not his day job.
Regards Ian.
I have fixed this incorrect text now. Thanks for the report.
-Ales
___
Hi,
this binary distribution runs fine on my lot of years old linux machine
(based on Suse 8.1, the first gtk release i ever could try), at least
gschem and pcb which i tried
Great. Thanks for the feedback.
-Ales
___
geda-user mailing list
Hi Paul,
On Tue, 2008-01-08 at 22:21 -0500, Paul Tan wrote:
2 years ago, I have already replaced my (US $15K/seat)
schematic/netlist commercial frontend tools, with gEDA;
for design of hundred million transistors VLSI design. All
becasue gEDA is a very powerful, generic, frontend
tools.
Hi Peter C,
I work in the industry. I have lots of confidence in
Ales leadership in gEDA-dev in making sure that gEDA
remains powerful and generic to allow gEDA to grow
in a generic way, so there is no need for me to setup
any fork branch of gEDA/gaf.
I will continue to contribute ideas, codes,
On Wed, 2008-01-09 at 01:33 -0500, Paul Tan wrote:
Hi Peter C,
I work in the industry. I have lots of confidence in
Ales leadership in gEDA-dev in making sure that gEDA
remains powerful and generic to allow gEDA to grow
in a generic way, so there is no need for me to setup
any fork
Hi Peter C,
The gnet_hier_verilog.sh script in gEDA/utilities, or
in /usr/bin/ folder normally, kind of shows a bit what
I would propose where the Fully Hierarchical
Parameterized Design should be heading for Verilog,
Vhdl, Spice, etc., consistent with what most
commercial advance VLSI tools are
Hi,
It's a New Year, so it's time for a slightly (very slight) new look on
the gEDA (http://geda.seul.org) website. A few of the changes:
* The usual gEDA logo is now integrated with the top nav bar. The idea
for this came from Peter Clifton. He also sent me working html and
css that
Ales -
On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 02:49:15AM -0500, Ales Hvezda wrote:
It's a New Year, so it's time for a slightly (very slight) new look on
the gEDA (http://geda.seul.org) website. [chop]
I humbly suggest you check your new pages against validator.w3.org.
It's easy and fun! After you add a
[snip]
I humbly suggest you check your new pages against validator.w3.org.
It's easy and fun! After you add a DOCTYPE and character encoding,
if you have any problems give me a shout. The links in the error
reports are usually pretty good about giving suggestions, though.
I'm afraid to
19 matches
Mail list logo
