Hi Bernd,
It seems that there is a problem with parallel build (make -j3). It works OK
without -j3 option. I think that gschem was build before libgeda and then link
phase failed.
Best Regards,
Michael
Dnia 7 lipca 2008 13:15 Bernd Jendrissek [EMAIL PROTECTED] napisał(a):
On Sun, Jul 6,
Kai-Martin Knaak schrieb:
Does your gafrc allow to search the directory where the second sheet is
located?
No, it didn't!
I put the second sheet in the same directory as the first one, but the
directory obviously didn't get searched - so I placed in the project
directory a file called
Hi Werner,
Werner Hoch schrieb:
Which patch have you used?
Uh... I'm not sure anymore, there was only one on the page where you
released it, IIRC.
Or is it already in the SVN
tree?
We're using git.
I've just rebased the branch at repo.or.cz:
On Monday 07 July 2008, Paul Tan wrote:
if you already have a Gschem schematic ready, that will
save me some time. Do you use spice-sdb gnetlist to
generate your netlist or do you use gnucap gnetlist ?
No. I typed it in with a text editor. Gnucap lets you type it
in directly if you want,
Based on Ben's GIMP work:
http://seul.org/pipermail/geda-user/2007-July/006639.html
I made the relevent changes to the png exporter to produce these
directly, and checked them in. Photos here:
http://www.delorie.com/pcb/ben-mode/
The shadow/highlight algorithms are designed
On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 02:32:01PM -0400, DJ Delorie wrote:
Based on Ben's GIMP work:
http://seul.org/pipermail/geda-user/2007-July/006639.html
I made the relevent changes to the png exporter to produce these
directly, and checked them in. Photos here:
I approve!
:-)
Feel free to go in and tweak if it you like, too. There's not a lot
of code specific to ben mode, and you can just search for ben_mode
to find it all ;-)
It's funny how boards have been used for so many purposes (bug
reports, examples of new features, etc) that they get
Werner Hoch schrieb:
I've just rebased the branch at repo.or.cz:
http://repo.or.cz/w/geda-gaf/werner.git?a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/netselection2
I've managed to check out the git repo, compiled it, but there doesn't
seem to be the patch included. This is supposedly because of my
pathetically
Cool. Looks very nice.
-dave
DJ Delorie wrote:
Based on Ben's GIMP work:
http://seul.org/pipermail/geda-user/2007-July/006639.html
I made the relevent changes to the png exporter to produce these
directly, and checked them in. Photos here:
On Tue, 2008-07-08 at 12:13 +0200, michalwd1979 wrote:
Hi Bernd,
It seems that there is a problem with parallel build (make -j3). It
works OK without -j3 option. I think that gschem was build before
libgeda and then link phase failed.
Best Regards,
Michael
Hi,
I hope you got it working
On Tue, 2008-07-08 at 13:30 -0700, Dave N6NZ wrote:
Cool. Looks very nice.
Indeed, although (sorry Ben), I'd appreciate it we could call it
something like photo realistic, or manufactured board preview, so
users who don't follow this list can have a clue what it does.
I like the colours. I've
Indeed, although (sorry Ben), I'd appreciate it we could call it
something like photo realistic, or manufactured board preview, so
users who don't follow this list can have a clue what it does.
Yeah, I figured it would need to be changed at some point.
I like the colours. I've been using
On Jul 7, 2008, at 1:49 PM, Gary L. Roach wrote:
Hi
I have installed the gEDA suit from Debian and am working through
Wilson's gsch2pcb tutorial. Everything works fine except that the
slot=1
and slot=2 attributes don't seem to work. The pins on both opamps are
numbered 1 - 5.
On Jul 8, 2008, at 5:49 PM, Gary L. Roach wrote:
On Jul 7, 2008, at 1:49 PM, Gary L. Roach wrote:
Hi
I have installed the gEDA suit from Debian and am working
through
Wilson's gsch2pcb tutorial. Everything works fine except that the
slot=1
and slot=2 attributes don't seem to work.
On Tue, 08 Jul 2008 13:07:26 -0400, al davis wrote:
I prefer to interact with the simulator directly. Most people
who interact through menus or only the schematic are light
users.
Most people, including me, who have worked with the
Schematic Driven technology that are employed by most
of the
On Tuesday 08 July 2008, Paul Tan wrote:
On Tue, 08 Jul 2008 13:07:26 -0400, al davis wrote:
I prefer to interact with the simulator directly. Most
people who interact through menus or only the schematic are
light users.
Most people, including me, who have worked with the
Schematic
Paul Tan wrote:
On Tue, 08 Jul 2008 13:07:26 -0400, al davis wrote:
I prefer to interact with the simulator directly. Most people
who interact through menus or only the schematic are light
users.
snip
I think Schematic Driven is the way to go.
Schematic driven simulation is practical for
Correction:
I think Schematic Driven is a way to go.
Best Regards,
Paul Tan
-Original Message-
From: Paul Tan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: geda-user@moria.seul.org
Sent: Tue, 8 Jul 2008 8:05 pm
Subject: Re: gEDA-user: gnucap - oscillator example
On Tue, 08 Jul 2008 13:07:26 -0400, al
On Tuesday 08 July 2008, Dave N6NZ wrote:
Schematic driven simulation is practical for homeworks, but
it doesn't scale.
For homeworks, they should learn how to use a netlist.
Actually, schematics do scale if you do it right.
Of course, we're talking about SPICE here, and nobody would
do a
19 matches
Mail list logo
