I'm trying to simulate an astable multivibrator with ngspice, but the graphic
i get is odd. I simulated the same circuit with qucs and ยก didn't have any
problem. I'm trying to figure out where the problem is.
This is the netlist:
*
My guess is that there is something different about the
designs/applications which are experiencing the lockups/malfunctions -
too many products use the FTDI USB to UART parts successfully. Among
many others are the Arduino Decimila and (Digi) XBEE daughter boards.
Peter TB Brett wrote:
On
On Apr 15, 2009, at 6:47 AM, joseda wrote:
I'm trying to simulate an astable multivibrator with ngspice, but
the graphic
i get is odd.
...
XU1 1 2 Vcc -Vcc 3 uA741
...
The voltage drop below 400V what's the problem?!!
You have a node named -Vcc. You haven't attached this node to
That was the trick! I fixed by adding a new voltage source of -15V (i called
Vee)
But why is not -Vcc the same as Vcc multiplied by -1?
Vcc is 15V so -Vcc should be -15 V but it doesn't work this way!!
Anyway, thanks!
You have a node named -Vcc. You haven't attached this node to
anything
On Apr 15, 2009, at 8:55 AM, joseda wrote:
That was the trick! I fixed by adding a new voltage source of -15V
(i called
Vee)
But why is not -Vcc the same as Vcc multiplied by -1?
Vcc is only a name of a network.
Vcc is 15V
V(Vcc) is 15V. Vcc is just a name. Now in *some* cases,
Hi,
I'm making a small project of the PIC Programator.
I find the Schematic on the internet..
I have done already the Schematic.
The schematic can be find here on my webserver:
http://csanyi-pal.info/apache2-default/letoltes/gEDA_schematics/
I run on it gnetlist. Only one NOTE I get:
NOTE:
On Apr 15, 2009, at 11:03 AM, Csanyi Pal wrote:
Hi,
I'm making a small project of the PIC Programator.
I find the Schematic on the internet..
I have done already the Schematic.
The schematic can be find here on my webserver:
I'm sure I've seen this discussed recently, but I can't find any threads
to pick up and follow...
Is there a way to suck all the gschem symbols into my schematic for
archiving and/or distribution?
Thanks,
Eric
___
geda-user mailing list
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 6:24 PM, Eric Brombaugh ebrombau...@cox.net wrote:
I'm sure I've seen this discussed recently, but I can't find any threads
to pick up and follow...
Is there a way to suck all the gschem symbols into my schematic for
archiving and/or distribution?
I may have been the
gschlas -e foo.sch
My Makefiles copy foo.sch to tmp.sch, gschlas *that*, then copy
tmp.sch to it's final destination.
___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
John Luciani wrote:
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 6:24 PM, Eric Brombaugh ebrombau...@cox.net wrote:
I'm sure I've seen this discussed recently, but I can't find any threads
to pick up and follow...
Is there a way to suck all the gschem symbols into my schematic for
archiving and/or distribution?
DJ Delorie wrote:
gschlas -e foo.sch
My Makefiles copy foo.sch to tmp.sch, gschlas *that*, then copy
tmp.sch to it's final destination.
Thanks - sounds nice and clean. Makefiles = good.
Eric
___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
12 matches
Mail list logo