On Sun, 26 Jul 2009 12:46:48 -0700 (PDT)
Josh Jordan outerspaceman81-/e1597as9lqavxtiumw...@public.gmane.org
wrote:
This exporter outputs a .dsn file for opening with freeroute.net. It
only works on 2 layer designs so far.
I searched google about this file format, and found that it has
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 8:49 PM, A.Burinskiyalexb...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear gEDA community members,
I created yet another netlister for gschem. Netlister supports flattened
or hierarchical netlist, handles slotting and global net names. Will be
glad to hear any feedback. The source located in:
It wont do what you want for orcad. It really only transfers pins and
pads, and stores every part as a seperate library entry. A real dsn
importer/exporter would be a lot of work but then we could be
compatible with orcad and whoever else. I posted an updated version
recently
On Aug 1, 2009, at 4:17 AM, r wrote:
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 8:49 PM, A.Burinskiyalexb...@gmail.com
wrote:
Dear gEDA community members,
I created yet another netlister for gschem. Netlister supports
flattened
or hierarchical netlist, handles slotting and global net names.
Will be
Hi R,
I thought about implementing some language for netlist and after all I
decided to go with plain C++ and get rid of using device attribute
unless it is absolutely necessary (such as input/output pin) and give
more strength to user symbol definition relying on the fact that end
user knows
On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 2:49 PM, A.Burinskiyalexb...@gmail.com wrote:
I thought about implementing some language for netlist and after all I
decided to go with plain C++ and get rid of using device attribute
unless it is absolutely necessary (such as input/output pin) and give
more strength to
On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 2:37 PM, John Dotyj...@noqsi.com wrote:
Hmm, I think Guile is fine for gnetlist's purposes. A minor problem
has been backward compatibility, leading to dependency hell. The
people who package the distros have this under better control than
they did a few years ago.
On Sat, 01 Aug 2009 11:17:10 +0100, r wrote:
I'm a bit puzzled that all of you tend to choose C/C++ for implementing
your tools.
like ist, or not, C is the lingua franca of computer science. I have yet
to meet an IT professional, who has never written any C code. In
addition, C is the
On Aug 1, 2009, at 9:21 AM, r wrote:
Well, I see several other problems here as well:
1. Guile (as a Scheme implementation) is not particularly well
supported, this leads to dependency hell and missing/incomplete
wrappers for modern libraries (like gtk2 - not really a problem for
gnetlist
Michael B Allen wrote:
Hi,
I can't get a simulation of this circuit to run:
http://207.192.69.113/~miallen/JFET_Preamp_1.pdf
I copied this from about half-way down this page:
http://www.ciphersbyritter.com/RADELECT/PREJFET/JFETPRE.HTM
Ok, I am not using GNU-cap or gEDA, but:
On Aug 1, 2009, at 10:03 AM, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
On Sat, 01 Aug 2009 11:17:10 +0100, r wrote:
I'm a bit puzzled that all of you tend to choose C/C++ for
implementing
your tools.
like ist, or not, C is the lingua franca of computer science. I
have yet
to meet an IT professional,
A long time ago someone posted to this list about a converter he had
written to produce svg files from schematics. His website,
http://www.mycgiserver.com/~emem00/sch2svg/, is gone. Then in 2007
somebody posted to geda-dev that they had mirrored the script at
I'm working on a gschem symbol generator(*). I'd like to measure text
width the same way that gschem does when calculating symbol width. For
a long time, I've been using a personal derivative of djboxsym -- DJ's
code simply takes strlen() * 110 and uses that. It's a good estimate,
but can
On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 5:09 PM, John Dotyj...@noqsi.com wrote:
Perhaps not Guile, but we're going to have to keep Scheme around for
a long time, because all those back ends are important. It's not that
there's a lot of code in them, but they embody a great deal of
research into just what each
On Aug 1, 2009, at 11:45 AM, r wrote:
On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 5:09 PM, John Dotyj...@noqsi.com wrote:
Perhaps not Guile, but we're going to have to keep Scheme around for
a long time, because all those back ends are important. It's not that
there's a lot of code in them, but they embody a
On Sat, Aug 01, 2009 at 03:07:43PM -0700, Josh Jordan wrote:
Please open this file and suggest what might be going on.
Your layer grouping is wrong. Your board has two layers but one of
them is marked as both the top AND bottom of the board, causing pads
to short to traces on both layers.
http://tech.slashdot.org/story/09/08/01/2114210/Cheap-Cross-Platform-Electronic-Circuit-Simulation-Software?from=rss
Cheap, Cross-Platform Electronic Circuit Simulation Software?
dv82 writes I teach circuits and electronics at the undergraduate
level, and have been using the free student demo
Note that the sym2eps converter I use for gedasymbols.org has a more
accurate width-measuring thing, although still not as accurate as
gschem. It assumes the font is helvetica-like. The sources are in
my gedasymbols area, under tools.
___
geda-user
You know the mechanical people have a livecd or I think it is dvd now.
Perhaps we should have an electronics live disk of some kind?
On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 9:01 PM, Bob Paddockbob.padd...@gmail.com wrote:
IMHO it would be better to have a gEDA that runs on Windows. We have
a PCB that runs on windows...
___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
key sentence:
gEDA is friendly to everything BUT Windows, and is nowhere near as
refined as OrCad.
So gEDA kind of anti-hit slash dot. The discussion is about everything
except geda.
Anyone to stand up and bash the poster of the topic for his judgement?
---(kaimartin)---
--
Kai-Martin
Anyone to stand up and bash the poster of the topic for his
judgement?
His judgement is pretty much dead on. Many people on this list are
openly hostile to Windows users, and we certainly haven't gone through
the effort to make our software install and run smoothly on Windows.
What ports we
On Sat, 01 Aug 2009 21:55:48 -0400, DJ Delorie wrote:
His judgement is pretty much dead on. Many people on this list are
openly hostile to Windows users, and we certainly haven't gone through
the effort to make our software install and run smoothly on Windows.
True. On the other hand, orcad
Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
key sentence:
gEDA is friendly to everything BUT Windows, and is nowhere near as
refined as OrCad.
So gEDA kind of anti-hit slash dot. The discussion is about everything
except geda.
Oh, he may just be asking for just what DJ said, a windows, Mac, Linux EDA
What a doofus. You can get any free-trial/limited commerical software
and hmm formulate the lesson to fit within the restrictions...
Electronics text books include 1 or several restricted commercial cad
softwares for this purpose.
I don't see anything wrong with teaching to a
On Sat, 1 Aug 2009, evan foss wrote:
You know the mechanical people have a livecd or I think it is dvd now.
Perhaps we should have an electronics live disk of some kind?
For a few semesters I was teaching gschem/pcb for undergrads. In the very
first semester I tried with live cd (one I built
26 matches
Mail list logo
