We've got OGD1 boards at the assembly house, and we've run into a
supply problem. The Conexant CX25874-24, the TV output chip we
selected, has reached end-of-life, and we're having trouble finding a
broker who will supply them at a reasonable price. For instance, one
broker we contacted hasn't
We now have multiple quotes, so we're all set. Thanks to those who responded.
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 10:33 AM, Timothy Normand Miller
theo...@gmail.com wrote:
We've got OGD1 boards at the assembly house, and we've run into a
supply problem. The Conexant CX25874-24, the TV output chip we
I'm having an issue exporting my board from PCB as a gerber.
Please take a look at this screenshot: http://flickr.com/gp/oskay/L98vvn
The pads look normal-- square to the page --in PCB, but are rotated strangely
when I export as gerber.
The footprint, as it appears in my PCB document is:
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 3:09 PM, Windell H. Oskay wind...@oskay.net wrote:
I'm having an issue exporting my board from PCB as a gerber.
Please take a look at this screenshot: http://flickr.com/gp/oskay/L98vvn
The pads look normal-- square to the page --in PCB, but are rotated strangely
That's really wierd.
The exports are correct, the GUI is wrong - your footprint really does
have oddly rotated pads:
Pad[-6703 -1 -6700 1 ...
That's a dX of 3 and a dY of 2. If you enable thindraw (the | key) it
shows the correctly rotated outlines.
Debugging...
On Mar 23, 2010, at 1:19 PM, DJ Delorie wrote:
That's really wierd.
The exports are correct, the GUI is wrong - your footprint really does
have oddly rotated pads:
Pad[-6703 -1 -6700 1 ...
That's a dX of 3 and a dY of 2. If you enable thindraw (the | key) it
shows the
Looks like a fundamental design issue. We use the X layer to draw
lines, which includes pads, but with the tiny offsets in the x,y
points, we end up passing two points to the X layer that have the same
coordinates, so it draws a zero-angle line. If you zoom in far
enough, eventually rotates the
DJ Delorie wrote:
I think there needs to be a way to specify the sort key and section
heading separately, as bom-Options is not a good text for a section
heading.
Perhaps a mapping between sort key and section heading could be found
once, rather than have to include both for every option?
Dan McMahill wrote:
DJ Delorie wrote:
I think there needs to be a way to specify the sort key and section
heading separately, as bom-Options is not a good text for a section
heading.
ack.
I just took, what the extract-docs script produces with no modifications
whatsoever.
Also we need
Would anyone answer a series of noobie questions?
I wrote it, so I get to answer the noobie questions :-)
___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
10 matches
Mail list logo
