Hi,
I am in the progress of making a DIP-64 carrier pcb for a QFP64 MCU
which also will carry voltage regulator, crystal and some glue logic.
My first attempt used a straight QFP64 package aligned 90 degrees.
When doing the routing I found that I my task would be a lot easier if
I could rotate the
I remember seeing http://www.delorie.com/electronics/r8c-27-adapter/ a
while ago.
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 5:29 PM, Svenn Are Bjerkem
svenn.bjer...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi,
I am in the progress of making a DIP-64 carrier pcb for a QFP64 MCU
which also will carry voltage regulator, crystal and
Oh I thought you were asking how to rotate.
Didn't read all email.
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 5:31 PM, timecop time...@gmail.com wrote:
I remember seeing http://www.delorie.com/electronics/r8c-27-adapter/ a
while ago.
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 5:29 PM, Svenn Are Bjerkem
svenn.bjer...@googlemail.com
Hello
i searched through docs, ml, config files and googled but could not find
out how to disable the menu bar in gschem. i mean the one with the
icons of the most used actions like new file, load/save, undo etc.
it was nice to have the first 5 minutes, but after getting familiar
with gschem it
Tamas Szabo sza2k...@freemail.hu writes:
I would create a schematic symbol for AT91SAM7 device: 64 pins, lots
of them with multiplexed functions.
1. I can number pins round, 1 to 64 sequentially:
+ easily fit to the schematic, 4x16 pin
+ easy to create the symbol
- no functional
On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 11:09 +0200, Stefan Tauner wrote:
Hello
i searched through docs, ml, config files and googled but could not find
out how to disable the menu bar in gschem. i mean the one with the
icons of the most used actions like new file, load/save, undo etc.
it was nice to have
*bump*
Can someone with push rights to gaf get Richard's gnetlist patch into
mainline?
Cheers,
Rob
On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 00:22 +0100, Richard Barlow wrote:
Hi
I discovered a bug in the partslist[1-3] backend for gnetlist when
processing hierarchical designs. It strips the refdes of
On Wed, 4 Aug 2010 11:09:49 +0200, Stefan Tauner
stefan.tau...@student.tuwien.ac.at wrote:
Hello
i searched through docs, ml, config files and googled but could not find
out how to disable the menu bar in gschem. i mean the one with the
icons of the most used actions like new file,
Tamas Szabo sza2k...@freemail.hu writes:
I would create a schematic symbol for AT91SAM7 device: 64 pins, lots
of them with multiplexed functions.
1. I can number pins round, 1 to 64 sequentially:
[snip]
2. I can separate pins by functions, without keeping the pins' order:
[snip]
On 08/04/2010 03:29 AM, Svenn Are Bjerkem wrote:
A first search for rotate footprint did not help
me out as quick as I wanted, so I went to my local pcb git repository
and updated the source to have the newest possible version and rebuilt
it. Checked the documentation and searched for rotate in
Stefan,
Use this in your gschemrc to disable the gschem toolbars:
; toolbars string
;
; Controls if the toolbars are visible or not.
;
;(toolbars enabled)
(toolbars disabled)
Bas
--
i searched through docs, ml, config files and googled but could not find
out how to disable the menu bar in
Can anybody tell me if the following is an Icarus feature or a Verilog
feature. I would expect the two $display statements to show the same
results. For some reason, the first one expands the result to 27 bits
instead of the 26 bits I would have expected. The only difference
(hopefully) between
On 08/04/2010 09:58 AM, Patrick Doyle wrote:
Can anybody tell me if the following is an Icarus feature or a Verilog
feature. I would expect the two $display statements to show the same
results. For some reason, the first one expands the result to 27 bits
instead of the 26 bits I would have
On 4 August 2010 16:08, John Griessen j...@ecosensory.com wrote:
Creating menu pulldowns for action commands isn't hard -- I've done some.
How about you next? If you do, I'll test them in the next two weeks.
Have to read up on that. I understand what you are talking about, but
I have no idea
On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 10:58:51AM -0400, Patrick Doyle wrote:
Can anybody tell me if the following is an Icarus feature or a Verilog
feature.
Verilog. Probably.
reg [5:0] offset;
reg [9:0] enablemask;
initial begin
enablemask = 10'b0_00110;
offset = 0;
Stephan Boettcher wrote:
Option 3.) I'd make a symbol for each function the chip supports,
and instantiate a subset of those that I need, carefully annotating
overlaps in pin usage, so that no pin is used twice accidentally. This
is required work for using such a chip anyway.
Note, that
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 11:46 AM, Larry Doolittle
ldool...@recycle.lbl.gov wrote:
On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 10:58:51AM -0400, Patrick Doyle wrote:
Can anybody tell me if the following is an Icarus feature or a Verilog
feature.
Verilog. Probably.
reg [5:0] offset;
reg [9:0] enablemask;
This looks like a bug in Icarus Verilog, I'm afraid. Since all the
values in your expression have explicit sizes, the bit width need
not have carry space tacked on and the width should be 26bits.
In fact, in your example the bus is particularly nasty because it
causes the enablemask bits to be
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 2:02 PM, Stephen Williams st...@icarus.com wrote:
This looks like a bug in Icarus Verilog, I'm afraid. Since all the
values in your expression have explicit sizes, the bit width need
not have carry space tacked on and the width should be 26bits.
In fact, in your example
Thanks guys. I'll dive right in and see what happens. I'll keep the
list up to date as I make some progress. (Ah the things I will do to
avoid my Thesis. :-P )
Mark
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 4:24 PM, DJ Delorie d...@delorie.com wrote:
Is there documentation in any form as to how to go about
On 08/04/2010 05:54 PM, kai-martin knaak wrote:
c) Rearrange the order of symbols in the file with a text editor.
Downside: laborious.
I know this sounds a silly idea, and I never found similar in any
schematic editor, but wouldn't it be possible to move pins dynamically
on the edge of the
On Wed, 4 Aug 2010 15:42:42 +0200
Bas Gieltjes b...@gieltjes.dds.nl wrote:
Use this in your gschemrc to disable the gschem toolbars:
; toolbars string
;
; Controls if the toolbars are visible or not.
;
;(toolbars enabled)
(toolbars disabled)
duh. toolbar not menubar... sorry and thank
On 08/04/2010 01:39 PM, Patrick Doyle wrote:
(I have already verified that the vvp file thinks it's operating on a
17 bit value instead of a 16 bit value, so I've narrowed it down to
not being a VVP problem -- which seems pretty obvious, but I like to
eliminate the obvious as quickly as possible
John Griessen wrote:
I agree with Andrew. We should use smaller icons, no text, with a
tooltip containing a description and the shortcut sequence.
+1
JG
I disagree.
Smaller icons than currently become a pain on large screens.
Icons should be scalable. There is a reason why desktop
On Thu, 2010-08-05 at 00:31 +0200, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
still offer an intuitive UI. Think Autocad Inventor, SolidWorks,
Microstation and the like.
In my opinion IncScape has a nice GUI, but I have no idea how those
Icons scale with screen size...
And they have a Lock Icon on the screen
Armin Faltl wrote:
I think your icons look nice, but as you stated, the text in them is
superfluous and should be in tooltips.
It should be text or icons or both -- configurable by the user. Text should
be real text, not part of an image. This allows for a configurable font size
and subpixel
On 08/04/2010 06:50 PM, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
Ok, I stop before I enter pipe dream mode.
Those are good ideas. Maybe he'll code two of them.
JG
or three...
PS larger icons are fine too. Configured via something like pcbmenu.res files
so we can publish many UIs, not just one. Board
Kai-Martin Knaak kn...@iqo.uni-hannover.de wrote:
If it were me, I'd suggest even more intrusive changes. From the top
of my head:
* icon bars, that can be docked or even moved outside the main window
* icon bars that can be user configured.
* simple keyboard input to move and place
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 5:14 PM, Tamas Szabo sza2k...@freemail.hu wrote:
I know this sounds a silly idea, and I never found similar in any schematic
editor, but wouldn't it be possible to move pins dynamically on the edge of
the device in gschem as simply as moving any other attribute like
Kevin Vermeer wrote:
kaimartin, are you saying that simply swapping the positions (just the
Y components, even) of a pin on a symbol will cause gnetlist to break?
No. I Am talking about the position in the *.sch file. Not about the
position inside the symbol.
It's a completely different
Stefan Salewski wrote:
In my opinion IncScape has a nice GUI,
It sure is a beautiful and very usable GUI.
Being such a high profile application, I'd expect the code up to standards.
A close look how they do things, may be useful. Besides, inkscape runs fine
on windows. So the notorious cross
31 matches
Mail list logo
