On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 2:31 AM, Stefan Salewski wrote:
> Some weeks ago I started working on a very basic schematics editor,
> compatible with current gschem file format. I am writing it in Ruby,
> using GTK/Cairo.
I while ago I started my own schematics editor - pschem:
http://code.google.com/p
On Saturday 25 December 2010, Vanessa Ezekowitz wrote:
> * If the part in question can usually be described by a
> single value, for the purposes of the signal flow in the
> schematic that is, then give it a default of "value=0".
No. Zero is almost always wrong. The only sensible default
value
On Dec 26, 2010, at 5:25 PM, Stephan Boettcher wrote:
> All the NASA QA, reviews, and stuff were annoying at first, but in the
> end there always were smart people asking the right questions at the
> right time to the right people.
Well, you've had better luck than I have. In three decades of do
On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 4:26 PM, Eduardo Costa wrote:
> On 26 December 2010 02:55, Mark Rages wrote:
>>
>> If it will stop the bikeshedding here, I volunteer to translate a
>> tutorial from crayon-on-napkin into LaTeX or DocBook or whatever. I
>> believe that the author gets to choose the format
thanxs a lot. It works now
here the working script:
pcb -x eps --element-color '#00' \
--pin-color '#cc' \
--layer-color-1 '#ff' \
--layer-color-2 '#ff' \
--layer-color-3 '#ff' \
--layer-stack "solderside,solder,silk" \
--eps-file "BOTTOM-$PROJECT_NAME.eps" \
--as-sh
On Mon, 2010-12-27 at 01:27 +0100, Michael Theurl wrote:
> Hello List,
>
> I try to export the TOP and BOTTOM eps files
http://geda.seul.org/wiki/geda:pcb_tips#how_can_i_print_the_bottom_side_of_the_board
pcb -x eps --layer-stack "silk,solderside" ..
The wiki calls it solderside, not only
Hello List,
I try to export the TOP and BOTTOM eps files from the pcb and it's very
strange the top eps with silk are great but the bottom silk are always
the top silk ?
Is there a hint to export the bottom silk ?
here my script:
pcb -x eps --element-color '#00' \
--pin-color '#cc' \
Eduardo Costa writes:
> In my opinion, while the idea of the wikibook is fine, it's gonna need
> of constant surveillance which in turn, means a pain in the ass for
> whoever is at charge.
I think this is FUD
> Ideally, all the needed documentation should come together with the
> software, and
Stefan Salewski writes:
> OK, shame on me for missing that option. But I do not think that this
> really proves that a gschem rewrite is obsolete.
I may believe that writing a second gschem editor is worse use of your
time than improving the existing one, but it is not up to me to judge
how you
On 26 December 2010 02:55, Mark Rages wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 25, 2010 at 4:16 PM, John Coppens wrote:
>> On Fri, 24 Dec 2010 16:20:03 +0100
>> kai-martin knaak wrote:
>>
>>> It about finding authors.
>>
>> I'm not entirely sure about that. I think there would be persons that
>> would be prepared t
John Doty writes:
> One "crazy" configuration was to reduce the number of bits/photon to
> one, and thereby achieve two orders of magnitude better time
> resolution than most people thought necessary while staying within
> data transmission restrictions. I'm told that this has been the most
> com
On Dec 26, 2010, at 3:12 PM, Bob Paddock wrote:
>>> Flexibility and specific applicability are not mutually exclusive, and for
>>> the very reasons you are citing here.
>>
>> True, but what makes this possible? It's *avoiding* specificity in the
>> foundations.
>
> I find that statement odd.
On Sun, 2010-12-26 at 14:33 -0500, John Doty wrote:
> On Dec 26, 2010, at 2:10 PM, Stefan Salewski wrote:
>
> > I have to modify the netlister and gschem -- gschem tries to be smart
> > and makes one single net when multiple net segments are in a straight
> > line.
>
> Doesn't putting:
>
> (net-
>> Flexibility and specific applicability are not mutually exclusive, and for
>> the very reasons you are citing here.
>
> True, but what makes this possible? It's *avoiding* specificity in the
> foundations.
I find that statement odd. If the foundation is not well specified
then it is not a fo
Add a "nopaste" flag to those pads. You might have to use a text editor
to do that.
___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
I have created a footprint for an edge connector. I created the fingers
the way I would create pads.
However looking at the paste gerber created, this means that solder
paste is put on the fingers, which I don't want.
How can I change this?
Philipp
___
On Dec 26, 2010, at 2:10 PM, Stefan Salewski wrote:
> I have to modify the netlister and gschem -- gschem tries to be smart
> and makes one single net when multiple net segments are in a straight
> line.
Doesn't putting:
(net-consolidate "disabled")
in gschemrc fix that for your purpose in gsc
>> I did not recall what I'd installed, and it looks like no specific
>> profile is set, which might be the problem in itself:
>>
>
> Interesting.
>
> For me no-multilib is marked with the star
Yes, the selected profile is indicated with star.
> and I do not really like to change it.
Me either,
On Dec 26, 2010, at 4:14 AM, Vanessa Ezekowitz wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Dec 2010 12:44:54 -0500
> John Doty wrote:
>
>>> "Often", perhaps, but not usually. No matter how you slice it, the most
>>> common way to use such a symbol and its corresponding physical
>>> representation is as a component on
On Sun, 2010-12-26 at 14:01 -0500, Bob Paddock wrote:
> >
> > Is your box also AMD64 no multilib profile?
>
> I did not recall what I'd installed, and it looks like no specific
> profile is set, which might be the problem in itself:
>
Interesting.
For me no-multilib is marked with the star, an
On Sun, 2010-12-26 at 18:57 +0100, Stephan Boettcher wrote:
> Stefan Salewski writes:
>
>
> > I think one reason for start writing it was my desire to assign
> > attributes/classes to subnets, to transfer this information to PCB to
> > support manually- and auto-routing with already specified pa
On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 12:41 PM, Stefan Salewski wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-12-26 at 12:09 -0500, Bob Paddock wrote:
>
>>
>> /usr/share/doc/ruby-gtk2-0.19.4/sample/misc/cairo-pong.rb:
>> 16: GTK+ 2.8.0 or later and cairo support are required. (RuntimeError)
>>
>
> Yes, that is the same what I got befo
On Sun, 2010-12-26 at 12:38 -0500, John Doty wrote:
> Stephan, this project is interesting. I'll try it on Ubuntu when I get
> back to Noqsi. I think I'll pass on trying it on a Mac for now (all I
> have here in Cambridge).
>
> I am puzzled, however, by your motivation:
I wrote something about i
Stefan Salewski writes:
> I think one reason for start writing it was my desire to assign
> attributes/classes to subnets, to transfer this information to PCB to
> support manually- and auto-routing with already specified parameters for
> traces.
Why do you need a gschem replacement for that?
On Sun, 2010-12-26 at 12:09 -0500, Bob Paddock wrote:
>
> /usr/share/doc/ruby-gtk2-0.19.4/sample/misc/cairo-pong.rb:
> 16: GTK+ 2.8.0 or later and cairo support are required. (RuntimeError)
>
Yes, that is the same what I got before fixing it by manually installing
rb_cairo.h.
The Gentoo people
Stephan, this project is interesting. I'll try it on Ubuntu when I get back to
Noqsi. I think I'll pass on trying it on a Mac for now (all I have here in
Cambridge).
I am puzzled, however, by your motivation:
On Dec 26, 2010, at 8:48 AM, Stefan Salewski wrote:
> I think one reason for start w
> Or try
>
> /usr/share/doc/ruby-gtk2-0.19.4/sample/misc/cairo-pong.rb
>
> Should fail too, with the same message as my script.
> All related to the missing rb_cairo.h -- some Gentoo people seem to
> think that it is obsolete, but it seems to be needed on some boxes.
/usr/share/doc/ruby-gtk2-0.19.
On Sun, 2010-12-26 at 17:47 +0100, Stefan Salewski wrote:
> Please try to execute
>
> /usr/share/doc/ruby-pango-0.19.4/sample/pango_cairo.rb
>
>
> If that fails, please add some comment to above bug reports.
>
Or try
/usr/share/doc/ruby-gtk2-0.19.4/sample/misc/cairo-pong.rb
Should fail too,
On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 11:47 AM, Stefan Salewski wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-12-26 at 11:30 -0500, Bob Paddock wrote:
>> > I would be interested how many people can run the demo script (peted.rb)
>> > from the top of the above page. Are the needed rcairo bindings shipped
>> > with distributions like U
On Sun, 2010-12-26 at 11:30 -0500, Bob Paddock wrote:
> > I would be interested how many people can run the demo script (peted.rb)
> > from the top of the above page. Are the needed rcairo bindings shipped
> > with distributions like Ubuntu? If not, then it may be easier for people
> > to install
> I would be interested how many people can run the demo script (peted.rb)
> from the top of the above page. Are the needed rcairo bindings shipped
> with distributions like Ubuntu? If not, then it may be easier for people
> to install the whole gEDA package than to get such a short ruby script
>
Hi Stefan,
> -Original Message-
> From: geda-user-boun...@moria.seul.org
> [mailto:geda-user-boun...@moria.seul.org] On Behalf Of Stefan Salewski
> Sent: Sunday, December 26, 2010 2:49 PM
> To: gEDA user mailing list
> Subject: Re: gEDA-user: Working on a tiny schematics editor
>
> On T
On Sun, 2010-12-26 at 09:28 -0500, George M. Gallant, Jr. wrote:
> Ran without any user intervention on Fedora 13. Installed Ruby
> some time ago without knowing if I would ever use it.
>
Fine!
> Depending on the window sizing, either the top/bottom horizontal
> line heights or the left/right ver
Peter Clifton:
> On Sat, 2010-12-25 at 16:06 +0100, Karl Hammar wrote:
...
> > Like, here is a led and resistor, we want to feed it with 12V, 5V etc.,
> > or is that more a job for gschem?
> That is beyond what we probably want to teach gschem.
Ok.
> Explicit parameter passing between hierarchy m
Ran without any user intervention on Fedora 13. Installed Ruby
some time ago without knowing if I would ever use it.
Depending on the window sizing, either the top/bottom horizontal
line heights or the left/right vertical line widths do not display fully.
George
On 12/26/2010 08:48 AM, Stefan S
On Thu, 2010-10-07 at 19:31 +0200, Stefan Salewski wrote:
> Some weeks ago I started working on a very basic schematics editor,
> compatible with current gschem file format. I am writing it in Ruby,
> using GTK/Cairo.
>
No, the project is not death...
I just managed to draw to a GTK drawing area,
On Sat, 25 Dec 2010 12:44:54 -0500
John Doty wrote:
> > "Often", perhaps, but not usually. No matter how you slice it, the most
> > common way to use such a symbol and its corresponding physical
> > representation is as a component on a circuit board or in an IC.
>
> Maybe for you. But gEDA isn
Hi all,
> -Original Message-
> From: geda-user-boun...@moria.seul.org
> [mailto:geda-user-boun...@moria.seul.org] On Behalf Of
> ge...@igor2.repo.hu
> Sent: Sunday, December 26, 2010 7:06 AM
> To: gEDA user mailing list
> Subject: Re: gEDA-user: Resistor values???
>
> On Sat, Dec 25, 2
38 matches
Mail list logo
